From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:08:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040109180839.GW1882@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0401091141200.12106@jju_lnx.backbone.dif.dk>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> I just wanted to get some feedback initially. The patch was a very minor
> bit of the email I send, and probably the least important bit.
> I wanted to get peoples reactions to the thought of adding stronger sanity
> checks. The patch was just a minor thing - the discussion about "do we
> want additional checks?" was the important bit.
There are some patches for the elf loader from one of the big names in LKML,
but I forgot who it was. Maybe a search through google will bring something
up...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-09 2:19 [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 2:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 3:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 3:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-09 3:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 20:20 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-09 20:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-10 0:27 ` Xavier Bestel
2004-01-10 2:27 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-10 9:52 ` Xavier Bestel
2004-01-10 13:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-10 22:38 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-10 22:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-10 14:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-22 19:24 ` [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanitychecking Adrian Bunk
2004-01-09 3:36 ` [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 4:15 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-09 10:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-01-09 10:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 18:08 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2004-01-09 18:25 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040109180839.GW1882@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.