From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.3-rc3: twice defined symbols with new radeonfb
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:47:21 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1076831240.6960.35.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040215074106.GQ1308@fs.tum.de>
On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 18:41, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 07:33:45PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >...
> > Summary of changes from v2.6.3-rc2 to v2.6.3-rc3
> > ============================================
> >...
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> >...
> > o New radeonfb
> >...
>
> I'm getting the following compile error (no module support in the
> kernel):
Yes, you can't build both old and new radeonfb's at the same time,
I should do some Kconfig stuff to check that I beleive. It make
no sense as you don't know which one will pick up anyway.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-15 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-15 3:33 Linux 2.6.3-rc3 Linus Torvalds
2004-02-15 7:41 ` 2.6.3-rc3: twice defined symbols with new radeonfb Adrian Bunk
2004-02-15 7:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-02-15 13:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-02-15 19:19 ` Roman Zippel
2004-02-15 9:17 ` Linux 2.6.3-rc3 Peter Osterlund
2004-02-15 9:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-02-15 10:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-02-15 10:51 ` Peter Osterlund
2004-02-15 11:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-02-15 11:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-02-15 10:33 ` Peter Osterlund
2004-02-15 15:03 ` Jonathan Brown
2004-02-15 16:05 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-02-15 16:44 ` Onur Kucuk
2004-02-16 15:58 ` Moritz Muehlenhoff
2004-02-17 16:29 ` Moritz Muehlenhoff
2004-02-15 19:52 ` Ernst Herzberg
2004-02-15 20:11 ` Peter Osterlund
2004-02-15 21:52 ` Ernst Herzberg
2004-02-15 22:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <200402152357.25751.earny@net4u.de>
2004-02-15 23:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <200402160033.43438.earny@net4u.de>
2004-02-15 23:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-02-16 0:29 ` Ernst Herzberg
2004-02-16 0:38 ` Ernst Herzberg
2004-02-16 0:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-02-16 1:18 ` Ernst Herzberg
2004-02-16 1:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-02-16 0:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <124101c3f435$9a66d3a0$1225a8c0@kittycat>
2004-02-16 2:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-02-15 22:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <200402160005.47892.anib@uni-paderborn.de>
2004-02-15 23:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-02-16 19:18 ` Linux 2.6.3-rc3 (compile stats) John Cherry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1076831240.6960.35.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.