From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
Cc: Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Patches for SCSI scanning
Date: 21 Apr 2004 10:36:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082561763.1934.12.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040421134846.GQ28633@tpkurt.garloff.de>
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 08:48, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> Any ideas?
> We need to use full 8byte LUNs then.
> * We can use them as opaque handles. Clean, but resulting in crazy numbers
Actually, I favour this. Internally we can a structure for the lun.
All we need to modify are the output routines (setting struct device
bus_id) so that we print it correctly according to LUN type.
> which sysadmins will hate us for.
Only if the device requests a flat space and then has huge numbers ...
in which case, we're only reporting what the device actually said...
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-21 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-18 18:57 Patches for SCSI scanning Kurt Garloff
2004-04-18 23:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-20 11:54 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 12:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-20 13:02 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-20 16:03 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 13:48 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:36 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-04-21 13:45 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:10 ` PATCH 1/5: scsi-scan-deprecate-forcelun Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:12 ` PATCH 2/5: scsi-scan-blist_replun Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:30 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:03 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:13 ` PATCH 3/5: scsi-scan-no-offl-pq-notcon Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:14 ` PATCH 4/5: scsi-scan-dont-att-pq-notcon Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:24 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:33 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-21 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 16:08 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 16:55 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 22:51 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-22 20:39 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-22 20:45 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 16:58 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:16 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 14:14 ` PATCH 5/5: scsi-scan-inq-timeout Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 20:24 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 22:48 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 23:49 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-20 16:26 ` Patches for SCSI scanning Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-20 16:42 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 17:44 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 13:52 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 10:24 ` Fabien Salvi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-22 4:09 Martin Peschke3
2004-04-22 4:17 Martin Peschke3
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082561763.1934.12.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.