From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
Cc: Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH 4/5: scsi-scan-dont-att-pq-notcon
Date: 21 Apr 2004 10:40:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082562046.1932.16.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040421141417.GV28633@tpkurt.garloff.de>
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 09:14, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> Don't attach high level drivers (except sg) to devices with peripheral
> qualifier indicating not connected (1) or not capable (3).
> SPC3, 7.4.2.
I'd really rather the pq field became part of struct scsi_device (just
like type is) so that it's parsed out in one place (scsi_scan.c) on the
initial inquiry. Then each ULD can simply look in that field.
This will future proof us against any expansion of the field.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-21 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-18 18:57 Patches for SCSI scanning Kurt Garloff
2004-04-18 23:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-20 11:54 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 12:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-20 13:02 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-20 16:03 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 13:48 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:36 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 13:45 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:10 ` PATCH 1/5: scsi-scan-deprecate-forcelun Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:12 ` PATCH 2/5: scsi-scan-blist_replun Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:30 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:03 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:13 ` PATCH 3/5: scsi-scan-no-offl-pq-notcon Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 14:14 ` PATCH 4/5: scsi-scan-dont-att-pq-notcon Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 15:24 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:33 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-21 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-21 16:08 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 16:55 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 22:51 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-22 20:39 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-22 20:45 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-21 16:58 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 16:16 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 15:40 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-04-21 14:14 ` PATCH 5/5: scsi-scan-inq-timeout Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 20:24 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 22:48 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-21 23:49 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-20 16:26 ` Patches for SCSI scanning Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-20 16:42 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 17:44 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-21 13:52 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-04-20 10:24 ` Fabien Salvi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082562046.1932.16.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.