All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* problem with documentation
@ 2004-05-14 14:34 Benjamin Case
  2004-05-14 22:28 ` John A. Sullivan III
  2004-05-18  3:42 ` Kiran Kumar Immidi
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Case @ 2004-05-14 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

I have just completed the the installation of IPTABLES in Debian based on
Russel's "Packet Filter" documentation.

I am now attempting to create the rules that Russel has provided in the
"Rusty's Really Quick Guide To Filtering".

Unfortunately I am receiving an errror.

polm:/etc# iptables -N block
polm:/etc# iptables -A block -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name

When I do an iptables -L , I can see the "block" chain.

Why does the second command return an error ?

Thanks,

Ben

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/2004




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: problem with documentation
  2004-05-14 14:34 problem with documentation Benjamin Case
@ 2004-05-14 22:28 ` John A. Sullivan III
  2004-05-18  3:42 ` Kiran Kumar Immidi
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John A. Sullivan III @ 2004-05-14 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Case; +Cc: netfilter

On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 10:34, Benjamin Case wrote:
> I have just completed the the installation of IPTABLES in Debian based on
> Russel's "Packet Filter" documentation.
> 
> I am now attempting to create the rules that Russel has provided in the
> "Rusty's Really Quick Guide To Filtering".
> 
> Unfortunately I am receiving an errror.
> 
> polm:/etc# iptables -N block
> polm:/etc# iptables -A block -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
> 
> When I do an iptables -L , I can see the "block" chain.
> 
> Why does the second command return an error ?
> <snip>
Strange, it works fine for me.  Is there any chance that you do not have
connection tracking enabled? What happens if you try to create the same
rule but for the FORWARD chain? - John
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: problem with documentation
  2004-05-14 14:34 problem with documentation Benjamin Case
  2004-05-14 22:28 ` John A. Sullivan III
@ 2004-05-18  3:42 ` Kiran Kumar Immidi
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kiran Kumar Immidi @ 2004-05-18  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Case, netfilter

On Friday 14 May 2004 08:04 pm, Benjamin Case wrote:

> polm:/etc# iptables -N block
> polm:/etc# iptables -A block -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
>
> When I do an iptables -L , I can see the "block" chain.
>
> Why does the second command return an error ?

The problem is because the state module is not being found. Make sure that 
libipt_state.so is among your iptables libraries, and that ipt_state.[k]o 
kernel module is present. It has nothing to do with the new chain that you 
have created.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-18  3:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-14 14:34 problem with documentation Benjamin Case
2004-05-14 22:28 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-05-18  3:42 ` Kiran Kumar Immidi

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.