From: Redeeman <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Subject: Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:37:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089182265.10687.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040707063100.GA18382@outpost.ds9a.nl>
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 08:31 +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 07:46:26AM +0200, Redeeman wrote:
> > this must be some misunderstanding, i do not want to complain, and i
> > dont hope people get that impression, i am trying to do feedback, so
> > that issues can be fixed.
>
> Redeeman - your firewall is broken, or somebody's firewall.
i dont have a firewall, but i am afraid my isp probably is doing
something, after reading another thread :(
>
> Look at /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale , if it currently contains
> 7, do:
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale
its 1 as default, using the tcp patch from another thread fixes so that i can connect to sites. (packages.gentoo.org etc)
where before that patch came, i echo'ed 0 into it, and it worked aswell,
however i didnt get more than 50kb/s either :|
> and retry.
>
> > downloads with 200kb/s from http://kernel.org, and 2.6.7 only 50kb/s,
> > this should be able to prove its some issues with 2.6.7, but thats just
> > my opinion
>
> Things can be more complicated than they appear. Currently all evidence for
> these changes points to firewalls messing with TCP options, TCP options
> which used to have more default versions in older kernels.
yes, i just realised that :(
>
> Regards,
>
> bert
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-07 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-05 23:38 quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix Redeeman
2004-07-06 0:54 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 13:25 ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 13:53 ` Erik Mouw
2004-07-06 15:49 ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 18:46 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 20:08 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 20:20 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 19:30 ` Horst von Brand
2004-07-07 0:42 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 1:12 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-07 4:46 ` qubes
2004-07-07 5:46 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 6:31 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 6:37 ` Redeeman [this message]
2004-07-07 8:19 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07 8:29 ` Redeeman
2004-07-07 7:45 ` Redeeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1089182265.10687.4.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.