All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Redeeman <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
Cc: LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Subject: Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:45:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089186337.12074.1.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040707063100.GA18382@outpost.ds9a.nl>

okay, no i tested using a hardware router as gateway and it works fine,
but this could aswell be because the hardware router is having the same
stuff as default has linux 2.6.5, i dont know,

what more shall i test? :)

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 08:31 +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 07:46:26AM +0200, Redeeman wrote:
> > this must be some misunderstanding, i do not want to complain, and i
> > dont hope people get that impression, i am trying to do feedback, so
> > that issues can be fixed.
> 
> Redeeman - your firewall is broken, or somebody's firewall. 
> 
> Look at  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale , if it currently contains
> 7, do:
> 
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale
> 
> and retry.
> 
> > downloads with 200kb/s from http://kernel.org, and 2.6.7 only 50kb/s,
> > this should be able to prove its some issues with 2.6.7, but thats just
> > my opinion
> 
> Things can be more complicated than they appear. Currently all evidence for
> these changes points to firewalls messing with TCP options, TCP options
> which used to have more default versions in older kernels.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> bert
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-07  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-05 23:38 quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix Redeeman
2004-07-06  0:54 ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 13:25   ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 13:53     ` Erik Mouw
2004-07-06 15:49       ` Redeeman
2004-07-06 18:46         ` Matt Heler
2004-07-06 20:08         ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 20:20           ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 19:30     ` Horst von Brand
2004-07-07  0:42       ` Redeeman
2004-07-07  1:12         ` Matt Heler
2004-07-07  4:46           ` qubes
2004-07-07  5:46           ` Redeeman
2004-07-07  6:31             ` bert hubert
2004-07-07  6:37               ` Redeeman
2004-07-07  8:19                 ` bert hubert
2004-07-07  8:29                   ` Redeeman
2004-07-07  7:45               ` Redeeman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1089186337.12074.1.camel@localhost \
    --to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
    --cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.