From: Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel events layer
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092080828.25658.19.camel@betsy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040809132907.GA1792@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:29 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Funny... you want to create new namespace and argue "no policy".
The idea was to create the simplest namespace possible (simply using the
source path names) since we need _something_ to send to user-space.
However ...
> If you want to translate it to something URI-like, you should
> do that in userspace.
It is no longer an issue, because the current plan is to tie the events
to kobjects.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-09 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 17:41 [patch] kernel events layer Robert Love
2004-07-23 18:25 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-23 18:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-07-23 18:35 ` Robert Love
2004-07-23 21:32 ` Dan Aloni
2004-07-24 2:47 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 4:42 ` Keith Owens
2004-07-24 5:00 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 8:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24 5:37 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 6:02 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 9:43 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-07-24 20:21 ` James Morris
2004-07-25 2:12 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 6:53 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-24 11:37 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-07-24 3:02 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 3:14 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 9:15 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 15:08 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 15:45 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 17:33 ` Ryan Anderson
2004-07-24 17:46 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-24 18:19 ` Robert Love
2004-07-25 18:11 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-25 19:08 ` Robert Love
2004-07-27 5:09 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-07-24 17:54 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 18:13 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 20:08 ` Rutger Nijlunsing
2004-07-26 20:10 ` Robert Love
2004-08-09 13:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-09 19:47 ` Robert Love [this message]
2004-07-24 3:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24 2:14 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 5:15 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 5:41 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 5:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 3:11 ` [patch] kernel events layer, updated Robert Love
2004-07-24 7:58 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 8:23 ` Deepak Saxena
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 6:04 [patch] kernel events layer Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 23:00 ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-26 7:31 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 14:50 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 16:12 ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 18:13 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-26 18:15 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 19:03 ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 20:44 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-27 18:15 ` Mike Waychison
2004-07-27 18:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-27 18:37 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-26 22:58 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-27 7:08 ` Deepak Saxena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092080828.25658.19.camel@betsy \
--to=rml@ximian.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@metaparadigm.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.