From: Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>
To: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>,
"Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
cw@f00f.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel events layer
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:15:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41069BB8.1030405@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040726204457.GA10970@hockin.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:03:05PM -0400, Greg KH wrote:
>
>>>On a related note, is this supposed to supersede the current hotplug
>>>mechanism?
>>
>>No, it will not. At the most, it will report the same information to
>>make it easier for userspace programs who want to get the other
>>event information, also get the hotplug stuff through the same
>>interface, reducing their complexity.
>>
>>So the existing hotplug interface is not going away at all. Do not even
>>begin to think that :)
>
>
> What about flipping it around and using either hotplug or a hotplug-like
> mechanism for these events?
>
> It solves the issue of events being dropped when there is no listening
> daemon...
>
> These are not going to be high-traffic messages, right, so the overhead is
> negligible...
>
The problem with this is that you'd lose the ability to send the
messages broadcast, whereby you may have multiple dbus's listening for
events.
- --
Mike Waychison
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1 (650) 352-5299 voice
1 (416) 202-8336 voice
http://www.sun.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE: The opinions expressed in this email are held by me,
and may not represent the views of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBBpu3dQs4kOxk3/MRAthIAJ41mD9SV3tfZosw2H26Vt4xayKP5ACbB4Eb
QQImIFvK2NXCt0B5dHPj5ps=
=1TDt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-26 7:31 [patch] kernel events layer Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 14:50 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 16:12 ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 18:13 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-26 18:15 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 19:03 ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 20:44 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-27 18:15 ` Mike Waychison [this message]
2004-07-27 18:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-27 18:37 ` Tim Hockin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 22:58 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-27 7:08 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-26 6:04 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 23:00 ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-23 17:41 Robert Love
2004-07-23 18:25 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-23 18:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-07-23 18:35 ` Robert Love
2004-07-23 21:32 ` Dan Aloni
2004-07-24 2:47 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 4:42 ` Keith Owens
2004-07-24 5:00 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 8:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24 5:37 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 6:02 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 9:43 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-07-24 20:21 ` James Morris
2004-07-25 2:12 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 6:53 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-24 11:37 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-07-24 3:02 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 3:14 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 9:15 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 15:08 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 15:45 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 17:33 ` Ryan Anderson
2004-07-24 17:46 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-24 18:19 ` Robert Love
2004-07-25 18:11 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-25 19:08 ` Robert Love
2004-07-27 5:09 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-07-24 17:54 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 18:13 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 20:08 ` Rutger Nijlunsing
2004-07-26 20:10 ` Robert Love
2004-08-09 13:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-09 19:47 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 3:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24 2:14 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 5:15 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 5:41 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 5:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41069BB8.1030405@sun.com \
--to=michael.waychison@sun.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=rml@ximian.com \
--cc=thockin@hockin.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.