From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Nathan Bryant <nbryant@optonline.net>,
Linux SCSI Reflector <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI midlayer power management
Date: 12 Aug 2004 12:29:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092328173.2184.15.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040812131457.GB1086@elf.ucw.cz>
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 09:14, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Even read-only access could hurt.... That DMA engine is going to get
> very unhappy if we change data from under it, right?
But we're not planning to change this area of memory (it's a driver
allocated coherent mbox) until we power off the box, right? so it should
be just like a reboot today.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-12 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 23:58 [PATCH] SCSI midlayer power management Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 8:09 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 13:13 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 13:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-11 15:21 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-11 16:28 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-11 16:43 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 7:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 10:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 12:48 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 13:14 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 16:29 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-08-12 19:11 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 19:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 20:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:31 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:42 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 20:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:52 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 20:40 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 23:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 22:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 23:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 13:41 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 16:45 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-08-12 23:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-11 20:19 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 20:50 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 22:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-11 22:48 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 7:43 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 9:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 13:43 ` Nathan Bryant
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-16 13:29 James.Smart
2004-08-16 13:29 ` James.Smart
2004-08-10 23:56 Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 9:53 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-11 12:55 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 13:39 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092328173.2184.15.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbryant@optonline.net \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.