From: Nathan Bryant <nbryant@optonline.net>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Linux SCSI Reflector <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI midlayer power management
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:41:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <411B736C.7030103@optonline.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092314892.1755.5.camel@mulgrave>
James Bottomley wrote:
>Why? We don't do a bus reset on boot, why should we need to do one on
>resume? For FC, the equivalent, a LIP Reset can be rather nasty on a
>SAN and should be avoided.
>
>
that can be host specific. aic7xxx does a bus reset on boot, so i
preserved this on resume.
don't know why they do it, but they do.
>The slight problem is probably going to be knowing that we may need to
>spin up devices (for internal ones) before resuming operation.
>
>
that's easy for system suspend, but somewhat harder for device suspend
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-12 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 23:58 [PATCH] SCSI midlayer power management Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 8:09 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 13:13 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 13:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-11 15:21 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-11 16:28 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-11 16:43 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 7:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 10:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 12:48 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 13:14 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 16:29 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 19:11 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 19:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 20:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:31 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:42 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 20:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:52 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 20:40 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 23:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 22:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 23:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 13:41 ` Nathan Bryant [this message]
2004-08-12 16:45 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-08-12 23:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-11 20:19 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 20:50 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 22:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-11 22:48 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 7:43 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 9:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 13:43 ` Nathan Bryant
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-16 13:29 James.Smart
2004-08-16 13:29 ` James.Smart
2004-08-10 23:56 Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 9:53 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-11 12:55 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 13:39 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=411B736C.7030103@optonline.net \
--to=nbryant@optonline.net \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.