Re: typos

[Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>]

On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 04:10, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi there guys,
> I've been pondering on posting about this for a long time but I guess
> I'll just go and say it. I've been reading the lkml for about a year now
> and, I don't know how important it is to you, but I think that typos in
> the comments in the kernel sources really annoy those who really read
> them in order to understand what's going on. Well, I'm one of them, and,
> since the typos are really a lot, I thought that maybe fixing them would
> be a good idea.
> Here's a patch. Please, tell me if you don't want such noise on the list
> but I think that, although not crucial, somewhat correct english in the
> comments would be better, or?
> 
> Regards,
> Boris
> 
> 

--- foo.orig	2004-08-17 04:27:55.000000000 -0400
+++ foo.fixed	2004-08-17 04:29:27.000000000 -0400
@@ -44,11 +44,11 @@
 and, I don't know how important it is to you, but I think that typos in
 the comments in the kernel sources really annoy those who really read
 them in order to understand what's going on. Well, I'm one of them, and,
-since the typos are really a lot, I thought that maybe fixing them would
+since there are really a lot of typos, I thought that maybe fixing them would
 be a good idea.
-Here's a patch. Please, tell me if you don't want such noise on the list
-but I think that, although not crucial, somewhat correct english in the
-comments would be better, or?
+Here's a patch. Please, tell me if you don't want such noise on the
+list.  I think that, although not crucial, somewhat more correct english in the
+comments would be better.
 
 Regards,
 Boris