From: "Kai OM" <epimetreus@fastmail.fm>
To: Lance Dryden <lance@jound.net>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sym53c8xx_2
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:24:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092738272.28646.202482540@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41209D02.6010202@jound.net>
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:39:46 -0400, "Lance Dryden" <lance@jound.net>
said:
> I can replicate the same problem with a Tekram DC390U3W, which is also
> based on the LSI53C1010. I am guessing it's a specific problem with the
> 53c1010, as I have since replaced it with a 53c895-based card (Tekram
> DC390U2W) and it functions normally in the same system.
>
> For me, the failure symptom starts with domain validation of the first
> device on the bus (Quantum Atlas V 18). The last lines indicate that
> domain validation is beginning for the device. After a delay, the SCSI
> layer reports an attempted device reset. Once that finishes, another
> delay and then the SCSI layer reports an attempted bus reset. I will
> need to re-attach a c1010 to the host in order to provide a precise log.
The device I have attached to my LSIU160 is a Quantum Atlas 10K II.
Model ATLAS10K2-TY734J.
I wonder if it's an issue with 53c1010 variants in general, or maybe
only when connected to certain devices?
Can you test a different drive on the 53c1010 controller?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-17 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-13 3:00 Sym53c8xx_2 Kai OM
2004-08-13 19:40 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-08-13 21:24 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Kai OM
2004-08-14 22:16 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-08-15 7:21 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Kai Makisara
2004-08-15 8:38 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-08-15 8:45 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-08-15 21:52 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-08-16 2:54 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Kai OM
2004-08-16 11:12 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-16 11:39 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Lance Dryden
2004-08-17 10:24 ` Kai OM [this message]
2004-08-21 22:51 ` sym53c8xx_2 version 2.1.18j domain validation failures (was Re: Sym53c8xx_2) Lance Dryden
2004-08-22 1:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-22 2:45 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2004-08-16 18:02 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Kai Makisara
2004-08-17 10:19 ` Sym53c8xx_2 Kai OM
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-17 18:06 Sym53c8xx_2 Vladimir G. Ivanovic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092738272.28646.202482540@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=epimetreus@fastmail.fm \
--cc=lance@jound.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.