All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Schlemmer [c]" <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][7/7] add xattr support to ramfs [u]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:27:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093296463.7561.0.camel@nosferatu.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040823205942.GA3370@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 977 bytes --]

On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 22:59, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:26:29PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 16:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 02:22:20PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> > > > This patch adds xattr support to tmpfs, and a security xattr handler.
> > > > Original patch from: Chris PeBenito <pebenito@gentoo.org>
> > > 
> > > What's the point on doing this for ramfs?  And if you really want this
> > > the implementation could be shared with tmpfs easily and put into xattr.c
> > 
> > For udev.
> 
> What's wrong with using a tmpfs for udev in such situations that xattrs
> are needed?  udev does not require ramfs at all.  In fact, why not just
> use a ext2 or ext3 partition for /dev instead today, if you really need
> it?
> 

Root-less boxes comes to mind ...  Wont comment on if tmpfs/ramfs
should be used though - that you guys can sort out =)


Thanks,

-- 
Martin Schlemmer

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-23 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-23 18:14 [PATCH][0/7] xattr consolidation and support for ramfs & tmpfs James Morris
2004-08-23 18:15 ` [PATCH][1/7] xattr consolidation - libfs James Morris
2004-08-23 18:16   ` [PATCH][2/7] xattr consolidation - LSM hook changes James Morris
2004-08-23 18:17     ` [PATCH][3/7] xattr consolidation - ext3 James Morris
2004-08-23 18:18       ` [PATCH][4/7] xattr consolidation - ext2 James Morris
2004-08-23 18:19         ` [5/7] xattr consolidation - devpts James Morris
2004-08-23 18:20           ` [PATCH][6/7] add xattr support to tmpfs James Morris
2004-08-23 18:22             ` [PATCH][7/7] add xattr support to ramfs James Morris
2004-08-23 20:26               ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 20:26                 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-23 20:46                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 20:59                   ` Greg KH
2004-08-23 21:27                     ` Martin Schlemmer [c] [this message]
2004-08-24  0:52                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-08-24 11:27                     ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-25  7:03                       ` Miles Bader
2004-08-25 13:14                         ` James Morris
2004-08-23 19:06             ` [PATCH][6/7] add xattr support to tmpfs Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 19:03     ` [PATCH][2/7] xattr consolidation - LSM hook changes Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 19:06       ` James Morris
2004-08-23 19:13       ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-24  0:54         ` James Morris
2004-08-24  2:52           ` viro
2004-08-24 19:27             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-08-23 23:28       ` Andreas Dilger
2004-08-23 18:49   ` [PATCH][1/7] xattr consolidation - libfs Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-24  4:32     ` James Morris
2004-08-24 10:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-24 19:42         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-08-24 20:19           ` James Morris
2004-08-24 19:41 ` [PATCH][0/7] xattr consolidation and support for ramfs & tmpfs Andreas Gruenbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1093296463.7561.0.camel@nosferatu.lan \
    --to=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.