All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	pmarques@grupopie.com, greg@kroah.com, nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: pwc+pwcx is not illegal
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:00:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093788018.27901.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408271226400.14196@ppc970.osdl.org>

On Gwe, 2004-08-27 at 20:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So stop whining about it. The driver got removed because the author asked 
> for it. 

Please put it back, minus the hooks so the rest of the world can use it.
If not please remove every line of code I've even written because I
don't like the new attitude .. so ner..

Point made ? We can't go around throwing out drivers because the author
had a tantrum. Its also trivial to move the decompressor to user space
where it should be anyway. Similarly the driver is useful without the
binary stuff.

Or do we need a -ac tree again where this time -ac is "added camera" ;)

Alan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-29 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-27 19:18 pwc+pwcx is not illegal Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-27 20:06   ` Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-27 20:21     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-27 20:24     ` David S. Miller
2004-08-27 20:26     ` Paul Jakma
2004-08-30 17:41       ` Brian Litzinger
2004-08-27 20:38     ` David Ford
2004-08-27 20:57   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 21:04     ` Greg KH
2004-08-27 21:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-29 14:00   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-08-29 16:33     ` Nemosoft Unv.
2004-08-29 15:42       ` Alan Cox
2004-08-29 17:17         ` [linux-usb-devel] " Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-29 17:16       ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-08-27 19:34 ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-27 21:34   ` Albert Cahalan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-28  8:15 Gabucino
2004-08-28 10:30 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 12:18 Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-28 13:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-28 15:24   ` Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-29 14:02   ` Alan Cox
2004-09-01 22:51     ` Rogier Wolff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1093788018.27901.35.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl \
    --cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.