From: Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>
To: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Cc: Kenneth Lavrsen <kenneth@lavrsen.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pmarques@grupopie.com, greg@kroah.com, nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: pwc+pwcx is not illegal
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:41:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040830174137.GB24392@top.worldcontrol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408272124300.2441@fogarty.jakma.org>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:26:26PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Kenneth Lavrsen wrote:
>
> >magazines and news papers. I just cannot accept that people can
> >care so little for other people.
>
> These people do care, they created, wrote and/or maintain the Linux
> kernel in the first place! They also are wise enough to care more the
> long-term interests of Linux than just the short-term.
So we have to step on a few people on the way to build our great
an glorious utopia! Well at leat it is for their own good.
--
Brian Litzinger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-27 19:18 pwc+pwcx is not illegal Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-27 20:06 ` Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-27 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-27 20:24 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-27 20:26 ` Paul Jakma
2004-08-30 17:41 ` Brian Litzinger [this message]
2004-08-27 20:38 ` David Ford
2004-08-27 20:57 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 21:04 ` Greg KH
2004-08-27 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-29 14:00 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-29 16:33 ` Nemosoft Unv.
2004-08-29 15:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-29 17:17 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-29 17:16 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-08-27 19:34 ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-27 21:34 ` Albert Cahalan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-28 8:15 Gabucino
2004-08-28 10:30 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 12:18 Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-28 13:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-28 15:24 ` Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-29 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-01 22:51 ` Rogier Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040830174137.GB24392@top.worldcontrol.com \
--to=brian@worldcontrol.com \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kenneth@lavrsen.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl \
--cc=paul@clubi.ie \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.