Re: [LARTC] RE: [LARTC] Load Balance simply

Re: [LARTC] RE: [LARTC] Load Balance simply

[JasonB]

Hello, 

From the looks of it you have the IP Network incorrect, You need to set
this to your Network... for example .. 

ip route add 23.215.4.0/26 dev eth2 src 23.215.4.61 table T2

23.215.4.0 is the network address, because 23.215.4.1 is my gateway for
this interface (Router). If you still have a hard time with it .. You
can post your Netmask and GW and I should be able to figure it out for
you. There may be a way to do it from your IP address, but I had
subnetting and aren't very good at it :) 



ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210 table 10

On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 11:02, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Thursday 26 August 2004 15:06, Marcos Schonfeld wrote:
> 
> Hi Marcos,
> 
> > ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table 10
> > ip route add default via $P1 table 10
> > ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 src $IP2 table 20
> > ip route add default via $P2 table 20
> >
> > ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1  # This may be not necessary
> > ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 src $IP2  # This may be not necessary
> >
> > ## ip route add default via $P1  ## You don't have to set this default
> > gw, because you'll be routing accross this gateway instead of doing
> > load-balance
> >
> > ip rule add from $IP1 table T1
> > ip rule add from $IP2 table T2
> 
> shouldn't this be table 10 and table 20? :)
> 
> anyway, I have a problem settings this up. I get:
> 
> 
> ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210 table 10
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> 
> ip route add default via 212.71.142.209 table 10
> ip route add 61.212.57.152/29 dev eth2 src 61.212.57.152 table 20
> ip route add default via 61.212.57.153 table 20
> 
> ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> 
> ip route add 61.212.57.152/29 dev eth2 src 61.212.57.152
> RTNETLINK answers: File exists
> 
> ip rule add from 212.71.142.210 table 10
> ip rule add from 61.212.57.152 table 20
> 
> strace from 1st RTNETLINK invalid argument:
> 
> ....
> controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 36
> dup(2)                                  = 4
> fcntl64(4, F_GETFL)                     = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE)
> fstat64(4, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(136, 0), ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
> 0x4b3ed000
> _llseek(4, 0, 0xb8526df0, SEEK_CUR)     = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
> write(4, "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argum"..., 36) = 36
> close(4)                                = 0
> munmap(0x4b3ed000, 4096)                = 0
> brk(0)
> 
> any idea what I am doing wrong?
> 
> Thanks alot.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] RE: [LARTC] Load Balance simply

[JasonB]

Can you post your Full config?  Might be able to help you out. I had the
same problem until I removed one of my config lines which fixed the
issue (Look at old Posts). 

- Cheers


On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 05:25, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:32, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:02, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > > ip route add 212.71.142.210/29 dev eth1 src 212.71.142.210 table 10
> > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> > blubber bleh silly me. I implemented ipcalc.pl in my brain now ;)
> 
> hmm, now what:
> 
> setting up that script gives me a default route to the 1st providers default 
> gateway and all traffic is going through that gateway (1st provider) and the 
> 2nd isn't touched in any way. Any idea about it?

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/