From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
lhms <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] buddy allocator without bitmap(2) [1/3]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:30:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093969857.26660.4816.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413455BE.6010302@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 03:41, Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA wrote:
> +static void __init calculate_aligned_end(struct zone *zone,
> + unsigned long start_pfn,
> + int nr_pages)
...
> + end_address = (zone->zone_start_pfn + end_idx) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
> + reserve_bootmem(end_address,PAGE_SIZE);
> +#else
> + reserve_bootmem_node(zone->zone_pgdat,end_address,PAGE_SIZE);
> +#endif
> + }
> + return;
> +}
What if someone has already reserved that address? You might not be
able to grow the zone, right?
> /*
> * Initially all pages are reserved - free ones are freed
> @@ -1510,7 +1574,9 @@ void __init memmap_init_zone(unsigned lo
> {
> struct page *start = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
> struct page *page;
> -
> + unsigned long saved_start_pfn = start_pfn;
> + struct zone *zonep = zone_table[NODEZONE(nid, zone)];
If you're going to calculate NODEZONE() twice, you might as well just
move it into its own variable.
> + /* Because memmap_init_zone() is called in suitable way
> + * even if zone has memory holes,
> + * calling calculate_aligned_end(zone) here is reasonable
> + */
> + calculate_aligned_end(zonep, saved_start_pfn, size);
Could you please elaborate on "suitable way". That comment really
doesn't say anything.
-- Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
lhms <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] buddy allocator without bitmap(2) [1/3]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:30:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093969857.26660.4816.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413455BE.6010302@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 03:41, Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA wrote:
> +static void __init calculate_aligned_end(struct zone *zone,
> + unsigned long start_pfn,
> + int nr_pages)
...
> + end_address = (zone->zone_start_pfn + end_idx) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
> + reserve_bootmem(end_address,PAGE_SIZE);
> +#else
> + reserve_bootmem_node(zone->zone_pgdat,end_address,PAGE_SIZE);
> +#endif
> + }
> + return;
> +}
What if someone has already reserved that address? You might not be
able to grow the zone, right?
> /*
> * Initially all pages are reserved - free ones are freed
> @@ -1510,7 +1574,9 @@ void __init memmap_init_zone(unsigned lo
> {
> struct page *start = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
> struct page *page;
> -
> + unsigned long saved_start_pfn = start_pfn;
> + struct zone *zonep = zone_table[NODEZONE(nid, zone)];
If you're going to calculate NODEZONE() twice, you might as well just
move it into its own variable.
> + /* Because memmap_init_zone() is called in suitable way
> + * even if zone has memory holes,
> + * calling calculate_aligned_end(zone) here is reasonable
> + */
> + calculate_aligned_end(zonep, saved_start_pfn, size);
Could you please elaborate on "suitable way". That comment really
doesn't say anything.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-31 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-31 10:41 [RFC] buddy allocator without bitmap(2) [1/3] Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-31 10:41 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-31 16:30 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2004-08-31 16:30 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-31 22:55 ` [Lhms-devel] " Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-31 22:55 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-31 23:12 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-31 23:12 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-31 23:36 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-31 23:36 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093969857.26660.4816.camel@nighthawk \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.