From: Norbert van Nobelen <Norbert@edusupport.nl>
To: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux?
Date: 28 Sep 2004 10:09:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1096358943.21271.21.camel@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040928075545.GA3298@cenedra.walrond.org>
Just the fact that the benchmark is this old, is a good reason to doubt
it.
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 09:55, Andrew Walrond wrote:
> I was pointed to this (rotating) banner advert at the top of www.eweek.com
>
> It claims that when comparing Red Hat AS2.1 with Windows Server 2003 on a dual processor machine, Windows Server 2003 gives 276% better peak performance, quoting Veritest as the source.
>
> I think the report in question must be this one
>
> http://download.microsoft.com/download/0/7/1/0715a190-70f5-4b0d-8ced-f9d1e046aa6a/netbench.pdf
>
> Its dated April 2003, so this was probably discussed a long time ago, but can anyone point me in the direction of an analysis/rebuttal of this report from the linux community? "Windows webserver gives 3x performance of linux" is something I need to be able to debunk, assuming it's inaccurate.
>
> Andrew
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Norbert van Nobelen
EduSupport
Postbus 95963
2509CZ Den Haag
T: 070-3280200
M: 06-43036586
F: 070-3280029
E: Norbert@edusupport.nl
I: www.edusupport.nl
B: ABN AMRO
R: 47.38.00.411
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-28 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-28 7:55 [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux? Andrew Walrond
2004-09-28 8:05 ` Andrew Walrond
2004-09-28 8:09 ` Norbert van Nobelen [this message]
2004-09-28 15:24 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-09-28 12:35 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-09-28 13:11 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-09-29 19:28 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-28 16:04 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-09-28 12:59 ` Patrick Kiwitter- Mailinglist
2004-09-28 14:12 ` [OT] Linux Claims 100,000% larger installed base than Microsoft Jeff V. Merkey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1096358943.21271.21.camel@linux.local \
--to=norbert@edusupport.nl \
--cc=andrew@walrond.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.