From: Tonnerre <tonnerre@thundrix.ch>
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Norbert van Nobelen <Norbert@edusupport.nl>,
Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux?
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:28:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040929192832.GC21770@thundrix.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7151E9B-114F-11D9-A7ED-000D9352858E@linuxmail.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 564 bytes --]
Salut,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 03:11:52PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> MS commissioned studies are totally useless: they only probe what MS
> wants. If MS wants us to believe earth is flat, a MS commissioned study
> will reveal so.
Reminds me in the Apple studies in the mid-90s when they were still
technologically behind. They always issued that Apple computers were
faster than Linux/BSD in some strange benchmark under unnatural
conditions.
Didn't Microsoft once compare Windows 2000 against Linux 1.2?
Tonnerre
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-29 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-28 7:55 [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux? Andrew Walrond
2004-09-28 8:05 ` Andrew Walrond
2004-09-28 8:09 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-09-28 15:24 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-09-28 12:35 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-09-28 13:11 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-09-29 19:28 ` Tonnerre [this message]
2004-09-28 16:04 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-09-28 12:59 ` Patrick Kiwitter- Mailinglist
2004-09-28 14:12 ` [OT] Linux Claims 100,000% larger installed base than Microsoft Jeff V. Merkey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040929192832.GC21770@thundrix.ch \
--to=tonnerre@thundrix.ch \
--cc=Norbert@edusupport.nl \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.