All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Erich Focht <efocht@hpce.nec.com>,
	LSE Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	simon.derr@bull.net, frankeh@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:52:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097275938.6470.97.camel@arrakis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41670CFC.1020306@bigpond.net.au>

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 14:56, Peter Williams wrote:
> > How do we describe the levels other than the first?  We'd either need
> > to:
> > 1) come up with a language to describe the full tree.  For your example
> > I quoted above:
> >    echo "0,1,2,4,5 3,6 7,8;0,1,2 4,5 3 6,7;0,1 2 4,5 3 6,7" > partitions
> 
> I think the idea was that the full hierarchy was (automatically) derived 
> from the partition in a way that best matched the physical layout of the 
> machine?

Absolutely.  I mentioned that in a different response in this thread. 
The default behavior on boot up should be for the
arch_init_sched_domains() to build a sched_domains hierarchy that
mirrors the physical layout of the machine for maximal scheduling
efficiency for general computing.  If the users/admin of the machine
want to configure the machine for a particular type(s) of workload, then
they can do that through the soon-to-be-figured-out API to rebuild the
sched_domains hierarchy in their own image and likeness...

-Matt


  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-08 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-07  0:51 [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07  2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-07 17:01   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-08  5:55     ` [Lse-tech] " Takayoshi Kochi
2004-10-08  6:08       ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-08 16:43         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 21:58   ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08  0:22     ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-07 22:20   ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07  4:12 ` [ckrm-tech] " Marc E. Fiuczynski
2004-10-07  5:35   ` Paul Jackson
2004-10-07 22:06   ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-07  9:32 ` Paul Jackson
2004-10-08 10:14 ` [Lse-tech] " Erich Focht
2004-10-08 10:40   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-08 15:50     ` [ckrm-tech] " Hubertus Franke
2004-10-08 22:48       ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 18:54     ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 21:56       ` Peter Williams
2004-10-08 22:52         ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
2004-10-08 23:13       ` Erich Focht
2004-10-08 23:50         ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-10 12:25           ` Erich Focht
2004-10-08 22:51     ` Erich Focht
2004-10-09  1:05       ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-10 12:45         ` Erich Focht
2004-10-12 22:45           ` Matthew Dobson
2004-10-08 18:45   ` Matthew Dobson
2005-04-18 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-18 23:44   ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19  8:00     ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19  5:54   ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  6:19     ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19  6:59       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  7:09         ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19  7:25           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  7:28           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  7:19       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  7:57         ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-19 20:34           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23 23:26             ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-26  0:52               ` Matthew Dobson
2005-04-26  0:59                 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  9:52       ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 15:26         ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-20  7:37           ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 20:42         ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  8:12     ` Simon Derr
2005-04-19 16:19       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-19  9:34     ` [Lse-tech] " Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-19 17:23       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-20  7:16         ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-20 19:09           ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-21 16:27             ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-22 21:26               ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23  7:24                 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-23 22:30               ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-25 11:53                 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-25 14:38                   ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-21 17:31   ` [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets (v0.2) Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-04-22 18:50     ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-22 21:37       ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-23  3:11     ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1097275938.6470.97.camel@arrakis \
    --to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
    --cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=simon.derr@bull.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.