From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>
Cc: Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@mvista.com>,
dwalker@mvista.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
amakarov@ru.mvista.com, ext-rt-dev@mvista.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ext-rt-dev] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:25:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097623513.19549.245.camel@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041012225706.GC30966@nietzsche.lynx.com>
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 00:57, Bill Huey wrote:
> But since this is in a commerical context we have to save
> face by at least putting our cards on the table and establishing
> a sort of role in this community.
Yeah, a pretty good way to establish a role by keeping your mouth shut
and let others do redundant work.
> That commericial development
> attitude the reason why I haven't been permitted to talk about
> this stuff openly, only sort of on the side in various
> preemption discussions.
Discuss this with your company.
> Yeah, for me a bit of freak out Saturday that is still
> kind of happening since this has been a personal project
> of mine for a long time. :) I interpreted it as a visibility
> move on your company's part, which I hate to say is a bit
> unnerving to know that another group was doing the same
> work. TimeSys's Scott Wood and friends are doing something
> like this as well. I'm only being fair by mentioning them. :)
There are other people around who worked on similar things openly.
> Well, uh, at least you're single kernel image folks like
> us and not flaming us/me yet for corrupting the sancity
> of Linux. Oh man, I feel a flame war coming. This is such
> touchy material.
The flame war might come, ...
> What's Monta Vista's attitude toward preemption development ?
> open or closed ? I know this is a charged question, but
> this has to be asked. :)
>
> This commerical thing is going to be weird. I wish I was
> an angry hippie instead of having a job at certain moments. :)
>
> But the bay area is pretty damn cool, so... that makes up
> for it. :)
... but not about realtime improvements.
It might be about: " hey we putting this up to play a role attitude of
comapnies".
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-12 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-09 5:59 [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2004-10-09 6:40 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 7:33 ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-09 7:42 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 23:40 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-10-09 8:52 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 23:20 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-09 23:24 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 10:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 13:15 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:20 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:35 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:37 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:45 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:55 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 22:21 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 23:52 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 0:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-10 0:45 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 1:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-10 1:09 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 0:43 ` Micha Feigin
2004-10-10 1:08 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 17:41 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 18:30 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:26 ` stefan.eletzhofer
2004-10-09 19:30 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 19:38 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:38 ` stefan.eletzhofer
2004-10-09 19:47 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 20:14 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:53 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 20:59 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:20 ` Robert Love
2004-10-09 20:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 1:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 19:41 ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-10 19:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-10 21:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 17:53 ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-11 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 21:44 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-11 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 23:05 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12 5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-14 5:09 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-10-14 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-15 14:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-10-15 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-15 16:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-10-15 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-10-17 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-12 18:50 ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-12 19:46 ` [Ext-rt-dev] " Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 20:31 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-13 0:30 ` George Anzinger
2004-10-12 21:12 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:24 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:13 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:41 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12 22:57 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:17 ` Adam Heath
2004-10-12 23:36 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-12 23:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2004-10-13 2:02 ` K.R. Foley
2004-10-13 13:39 ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13 13:26 ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-10-13 15:04 ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13 14:55 ` Kurt Wall
2004-10-13 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-13 15:56 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-13 16:13 ` Robert Love
2004-10-13 17:14 ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13 3:55 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 22:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 22:36 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:33 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:52 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-13 0:59 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-10-10 12:21 ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 17:26 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 18:45 ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 20:44 ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 17:29 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1097623513.19549.245.camel@thomas \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=amakarov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=ext-rt-dev@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.