From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: New consolidate irqs vs . probe_irq_*()
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:53:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1098262403.6278.16.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041020084838.GA25798@elte.hu>
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 18:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yeah. I've put it into a separate autoprobe.c file specifically for that
> reason, you can exclude it in the Makefile and can provide your own
> architecture version. Or should we make the no-autoprobing choice
> generic perhaps?
I like this later option... How may archs actually had autoprobing
implemented and actually used ?
Well, I'll do some grep'ing around tonight as I do the NO_IRQ stuff
and see what makes more sense. I don't think an arch that didn't have
autoprobing needs it now, besides, it's not exactly a reliable
mecanism...
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-20 7:08 [PATCH] Fix PREEMPT_ACTIVE definition Paul Mackerras
2004-10-20 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-20 8:42 ` New consolidate irqs vs . probe_irq_*() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-20 8:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-10-20 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-20 10:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20 9:31 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-10-20 9:01 ` Russell King
2004-10-20 10:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20 11:01 ` Russell King
2004-10-20 11:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20 11:53 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-10-20 12:31 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1098262403.6278.16.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.