From: Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich@uswest.net>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] DIFF use 6-regs in copy_user_page_asm
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 01:23:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1104826986.8221.8.camel@beavis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050104061342.GE18497@tausq.org>
Randolph,
Is this something that would benefit older processors? Say a PCX-T
processor? Is this something worth testing? I'm pretty sure I
have a PCX-T processor around I could boot up and test.
- Ryan
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 22:13 -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > This patch adds one more cycle between the load and store of a
> > given register by using three pairs of registers instead of two.
> > I had previously quoted one of the PA-8xxx papers that indicated
> > L1 cache was 2 cycles latency.
> > With this diff, the unrolled part of the loop now meets that.
> > The prolog and epilogue obviously cannot.
> >
> > If anyone can show me a workload that improves with this diff,
> > I'll apply it. Otherwise it's just an academic excercise.
>
> i'd like to see numbers too, but i doubt you will see any. it appears
> that at least newer PA cpus do a sufficient amount of internal
> instruction reordering that you don't see a difference as long as there
> are enough pending instructions to keep the pipeline busy.
>
> randolph
--
Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich@uswest.net>
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-03 6:19 [parisc-linux] DIFF use 6-regs in copy_user_page_asm Grant Grundler
2005-01-04 6:13 ` Randolph Chung
2005-01-04 8:23 ` Ryan Bradetich [this message]
2005-01-04 8:29 ` Randolph Chung
2005-01-04 13:12 ` Joel Soete
2005-01-04 14:51 ` Michael S. Zick
2005-01-04 16:02 ` Grant Grundler
[not found] ` <200501041142.44400.mszick@wolfbutter.com>
2005-01-04 20:09 ` Grant Grundler
2005-01-04 23:39 ` Grant Grundler
2005-01-05 0:00 ` John David Anglin
2005-01-05 22:01 ` Michael S. Zick
2005-01-06 22:55 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1104826986.8221.8.camel@beavis \
--to=rbradetich@uswest.net \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.