From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
perex@suse.cz
Subject: Re: Re: 2.6.10-mm1: ALSA ac97 compile error with CONFIG_PM=n
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:04:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1104948279.8589.42.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hhdlvyg6q.wl@alsa2.suse.de>
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 17:49 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:21:20 -0600,
> Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com wrote:
> >
> > > At Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:25:40 -0600,
> > > Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com wrote:
> > > > [snip - how to get to the problem]
> > > > At this point, I get the window asking if I heard the sound (I did
> > not). If
> > > > I repeat the test after waiting a short period, it eventually succeeds.
> > >
> > > The default blocking behavior of OSS devices was changed recently.
> > > When the device is in use, open returns -EBUSY immediately in the
> > > latest version while it was blocked until released in the former
> > > version.
> > I suppose there was a "good reason" for changing the user level
> > interface in this way. Could you [or someone else] explain that and
> > if you would consider changing it back (to stop breaking old applications)?
>
> It was discussed on alsa-devel in November. Unfortunately, I can't
> find ML archive any longer...
>
Heh, if you want the excruciating details, here are some pointers. It's
a long thread, and unfortunately the threading is a little broken.
Here's a link to the technical part:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10008900
And here's the rant that started it:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10014826
Lee
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
perex@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.10-mm1: ALSA ac97 compile error with CONFIG_PM=n
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:04:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1104948279.8589.42.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hhdlvyg6q.wl@alsa2.suse.de>
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 17:49 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:21:20 -0600,
> Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com wrote:
> >
> > > At Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:25:40 -0600,
> > > Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com wrote:
> > > > [snip - how to get to the problem]
> > > > At this point, I get the window asking if I heard the sound (I did
> > not). If
> > > > I repeat the test after waiting a short period, it eventually succeeds.
> > >
> > > The default blocking behavior of OSS devices was changed recently.
> > > When the device is in use, open returns -EBUSY immediately in the
> > > latest version while it was blocked until released in the former
> > > version.
> > I suppose there was a "good reason" for changing the user level
> > interface in this way. Could you [or someone else] explain that and
> > if you would consider changing it back (to stop breaking old applications)?
>
> It was discussed on alsa-devel in November. Unfortunately, I can't
> find ML archive any longer...
>
Heh, if you want the excruciating details, here are some pointers. It's
a long thread, and unfortunately the threading is a little broken.
Here's a link to the technical part:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10008900
And here's the rant that started it:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=10014826
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-05 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-05 14:21 [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.10-mm1: ALSA ac97 compile error with CONFIG_PM=n Mark_H_Johnson
2005-01-05 14:56 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-05 14:56 ` [Alsa-devel] " Alan Cox
2005-01-05 17:23 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-05 17:23 ` [Alsa-devel] " Lee Revell
2005-01-05 16:49 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-01-05 16:49 ` [Alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2005-01-05 18:04 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-01-05 18:04 ` Lee Revell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-07 14:41 Mark_H_Johnson
2005-01-05 18:15 Mark_H_Johnson
2005-01-04 19:25 Mark_H_Johnson
2005-01-05 13:41 ` [Alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2005-01-05 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-05 21:43 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-06 16:30 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-05 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1104948279.8589.42.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.