All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: node_online_map patch kills x86_64
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:42:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1105555323.8266.2.camel@arrakis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050111163504.D24171@build.pdx.osdl.net>

On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 16:35, Chris Wright wrote:
> * William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:16:56PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > Backing out the x86_64 specific bits of the numnodes -> node_online_map
> > > patch and the generic bits from wli, kills my machine at boot.
> > > It hits the early_idt_handler and dies straight away.  What would help
> > > to debug this thing?
> > 
> > The only part of this I'm responsible for is converting build_zonelists()
> > to pass its nodemask argument by reference to address a livelock. I feel
> > your pain and if not otherwise occupied I would help fix your problem
> > right away.
> 
> Thanks wli.  Seems Andi understands the issue despite my unintelligible
> bug report ;-)
> 
> thanks,
> -chris

So I assume you were trying to saying that backing out the patches makes
the machine boot, and leaving them in kills it, right?  And does Andi's
"[PATCH] x86_64: Optimize nodemask operations slightly" fix your
problem?  I'm assuming that's what the reference to "Andi understanding
the issue" meant?  Or is there still a problem booting x86_64 with the
numnodes -> node_online_map patches?

-Matt


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-12 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-11 23:16 node_online_map patch kills x86_64 Chris Wright
2005-01-11 23:42 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-12  0:30   ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12  1:38     ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-12  1:53       ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12  2:00         ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-12  2:10           ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12  0:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-01-12  0:35   ` Chris Wright
2005-01-12 18:42     ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
2005-01-12 19:20       ` Chris Wright
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-12  2:03 Petr Vandrovec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1105555323.8266.2.camel@arrakis \
    --to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.