Feature Request / I'm missing something: reply2list?

Feature Request / I'm missing something: reply2list?

[Mike Grice]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 851 bytes --]

Hi all,

I'm finding my feet with mlmmj, but I've just got a couple of questions:

1) Is there a tunable (or could one be added) where I can set the reply
address of posts coming through the list to be the list address:  e.g.,
for a list of foo@bar.com, can the reply-to: / from: address be set to
foo@bar.com as opposed to the person who sent the message?

2) If I have an account where I have multiple domains pointing to my
email box, is there a way for mlmmj to recognise these?  e.g., the To:
address could be "foo@bar.com" or "foo@baz.com", given that both domains
are pointing to my same account?  I know I can set 'tocc' to make this
work, but again this will open up the chance of BCC: style abuse.

Thanks for reading, all advice appreciated!

Cheers
Mike
-- 
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Feature Request / I'm missing something: reply2list?

[Mads Martin Joergensen]

* Mike Grice <Mike@MikeGrice.com> [Feb 01. 2005 19:01]:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm finding my feet with mlmmj, but I've just got a couple of questions:
> 
> 1) Is there a tunable (or could one be added) where I can set the reply
> address of posts coming through the list to be the list address:  e.g.,
> for a list of foo@bar.com, can the reply-to: / from: address be set to
> foo@bar.com as opposed to the person who sent the message?

As said in TUNABLES:

   · customheaders                (list)

   These headers are added to every mail coming through. This is the
   place you want to add Reply-To: header in case you want such.

So adding a line in control/customheaders saying:

   Reply-To: foo@bar.com

Will get you what you want.

> 2) If I have an account where I have multiple domains pointing to my
> email box, is there a way for mlmmj to recognise these?  e.g., the To:
> address could be "foo@bar.com" or "foo@baz.com", given that both domains
> are pointing to my same account?  I know I can set 'tocc' to make this
> work, but again this will open up the chance of BCC: style abuse.

Not yet possible. But it's doable. Any objections from people on the
list against having DIR/control/alternates with other list
emailaddresses? If not, I'll add it in an upcoming release.

-- 
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
 and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
                                -- A. P. J.

Re: Feature Request / I'm missing something: reply2list?

[Wolf Bergenheim]

On Tuesday 01 February 2005 20:51, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote:

>
> Not yet possible. But it's doable. Any objections from people on the
> list against having DIR/control/alternates with other list
> emailaddresses? If not, I'll add it in an upcoming release.

or how about allowing multiple entries in the LIST/control/listaddress that 
would seem to be more logical IMO...

--W

-- 

<:3 )---- Wolf Bergenheim ----( 8:>

Re: Feature Request / I'm missing something: reply2list?

[Mads Martin Joergensen]

* Wolf Bergenheim <wolf+mlmmj@bergenheim.net> [Feb 01. 2005 23:44]:
> > Not yet possible. But it's doable. Any objections from people on the
> > list against having DIR/control/alternates with other list
> > emailaddresses? If not, I'll add it in an upcoming release.
> 
> or how about allowing multiple entries in the LIST/control/listaddress that 
> would seem to be more logical IMO...

Yes, indeed it would. First address, would be the precedence one then.

-- 
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
 and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
                                -- A. P. J.