All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	stefanha@redhat.com, rjones@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] R: Re: [PATCH v2] AioContext: fix broken placement of event_notifier_test_and_clear
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:42:55 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1108497253.1650856.1437396175024.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150720100648.GA22650@ad.nay.redhat.com>


> > I'm looking at optimizing it but I don't fully understand the relationship
> > between aio_prepare and WaitForMultipleObjects. Do they get the same set of
> > events?
> 
> After some reading I think WaitForMultipleObjects is for event notifiers and
> aio_prepare is for select() on fd events.
> It's a bit trickier than aio-posix, in the first iteration there could be
> another event masking ctx->notifier so we don't know if we need to clear it.
> Maybe we can reverse events[] so that ctx->notifier will be the 0th one. And I
> think we can always remove it after first iteration, am I right?

Yes, that would work. I am not sure how complex it would be. You would also need
a solution for the GSource and one (probably similar to aio-posix) for your
epoll implementation. With ctx->notified at least you can encapsulate it in
aio_notify_accept...

Stefan, any preferences?

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-20 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-20  5:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] AioContext: fix broken placement of event_notifier_test_and_clear Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-20  7:46 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-20 10:06   ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-20 12:42     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-21  1:19       ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-21  6:51         ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-20 16:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-20 19:50   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-21 11:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1108497253.1650856.1437396175024.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.