All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	stefanha@redhat.com, rjones@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] AioContext: fix broken placement of event_notifier_test_and_clear
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:46:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720074625.GA20738@ad.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437370031-9070-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Mon, 07/20 07:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> diff --git a/aio-win32.c b/aio-win32.c
> index ea655b0..7afc999 100644
> --- a/aio-win32.c
> +++ b/aio-win32.c
> @@ -337,10 +337,11 @@ bool aio_poll(AioContext *ctx, bool blocking)
>              aio_context_acquire(ctx);
>          }
>  
> -        if (first && aio_bh_poll(ctx)) {
> -            progress = true;
> +        if (first) {
> +            event_notifier_test_and_clear(&ctx->notifier);

I'm looking at optimizing it but I don't fully understand the relationship
between aio_prepare and WaitForMultipleObjects. Do they get the same set of
events? What if a new event comes in between, for example, thread worker calls
aio_notify()?

Fam

> +            progress |= aio_bh_poll(ctx);
> +            first = false;
>          }
> -        first = false;
>  
>          /* if we have any signaled events, dispatch event */
>          event = NULL;

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-20  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-20  5:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] AioContext: fix broken placement of event_notifier_test_and_clear Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-20  7:46 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-07-20 10:06   ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-20 12:42     ` [Qemu-devel] R: " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-21  1:19       ` [Qemu-devel] " Fam Zheng
2015-07-21  6:51         ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-20 16:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-20 19:50   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-21 11:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150720074625.GA20738@ad.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.