From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 0/2 Buddy allocator with placement policy (Version 9) + prezeroing (Version 4)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:37:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110476267.16432.27.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503101421260.2105@skynet>
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 14:31 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > There are 2 kinds of sections: user and kernel. The traditional
> > > ZONE_HIGHMEM is full of user sections (except for vmalloc).
>
> And PTEs if configured to be allocated from high memory. I have not double
> checked but I don't think they can be trivially reclaimed.
We've run into a couple of these pieces of highmem that can't be
reclaimed. The latest one are pages for the new pipe buffers. We could
code these up with a flag something like __GFP_HIGHMEM_NORCLM, that is
__GFP_HIGHMEM in the normal case, but 0 in the hotplug case (at least
for now).
> > > Any
> > > section which has slab pages or any kernel caller to alloc_pages() is
> > > a kernel section.
>
> Slab pages could be moved to the user section as long as the cache owner
> was able to reclaim the slabs on demand.
At least for the large consumers of slab (dentry/inode caches), they
can't quite reclaim on demand. I was picking Dipankar's brain about
this one day, and there are going to be particularly troublesome
dentries, like "/", that are going to need some serious rethinking to be
able to forcefully free.
-- Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 0/2 Buddy allocator with placement policy (Version 9) + prezeroing (Version 4)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:37:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110476267.16432.27.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503101421260.2105@skynet>
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 14:31 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > There are 2 kinds of sections: user and kernel. The traditional
> > > ZONE_HIGHMEM is full of user sections (except for vmalloc).
>
> And PTEs if configured to be allocated from high memory. I have not double
> checked but I don't think they can be trivially reclaimed.
We've run into a couple of these pieces of highmem that can't be
reclaimed. The latest one are pages for the new pipe buffers. We could
code these up with a flag something like __GFP_HIGHMEM_NORCLM, that is
__GFP_HIGHMEM in the normal case, but 0 in the hotplug case (at least
for now).
> > > Any
> > > section which has slab pages or any kernel caller to alloc_pages() is
> > > a kernel section.
>
> Slab pages could be moved to the user section as long as the cache owner
> was able to reclaim the slabs on demand.
At least for the large consumers of slab (dentry/inode caches), they
can't quite reclaim on demand. I was picking Dipankar's brain about
this one day, and there are going to be particularly troublesome
dentries, like "/", that are going to need some serious rethinking to be
able to forcefully free.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-10 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-07 19:39 [PATCH] 0/2 Buddy allocator with placement policy (Version 9) + prezeroing (Version 4) Mel Gorman
2005-03-07 19:39 ` Mel Gorman
2005-03-07 23:59 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-07 23:59 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-10 14:31 ` Mel Gorman
2005-03-10 14:31 ` Mel Gorman
2005-03-10 17:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 17:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 18:16 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-10 18:16 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-10 20:11 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 20:11 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 20:17 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-10 20:17 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-10 20:54 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 20:54 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-14 14:10 ` Mel Gorman
2005-03-14 14:10 ` Mel Gorman
2005-03-14 19:10 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-14 19:10 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 17:37 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-03-10 17:37 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1110476267.16432.27.camel@localhost \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.