From: Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>
To: felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
cpufreq@ZenII.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:20:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1111454454.6633.5.camel@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050321163225.4af1c169.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Felix von Leitner <felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Finally Centrino SpeedStep.
> > > > I have a "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz" in my notebook.
> > > > Linux does not support it. This architecture has been out there for
> > > > months now, and there even was a patch to support it posted here a in
> > > > October last year or so. Linux still does not include it. Until
> > > > 2.6.11-rc4-bk8 or so, the old patched file from back then still worked.
> > > > Now it doesn't. Because some interface changed. Now what? Using a
> > > > Centrino notebook without CPU throttling is completely out of the
> > > > question. Linux might as well not boot on it at all.
> > >
> > > Could you please dig out the old patch, send it?
> >
> > Why not use ACPI for CPU scaling?
> >
>
> Felix, did you try this?
>
ACPI is the preferred (and only standardized) method of controlling cpu
throttling on x86 systems.
Also, as I said earlier, I wanted to see an lspci for the usb issues.
Thanks,
Adam
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>
To: felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@ZenII.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:20:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1111454454.6633.5.camel@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050321163225.4af1c169.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Felix von Leitner <felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Finally Centrino SpeedStep.
> > > > I have a "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz" in my notebook.
> > > > Linux does not support it. This architecture has been out there for
> > > > months now, and there even was a patch to support it posted here a in
> > > > October last year or so. Linux still does not include it. Until
> > > > 2.6.11-rc4-bk8 or so, the old patched file from back then still worked.
> > > > Now it doesn't. Because some interface changed. Now what? Using a
> > > > Centrino notebook without CPU throttling is completely out of the
> > > > question. Linux might as well not boot on it at all.
> > >
> > > Could you please dig out the old patch, send it?
> >
> > Why not use ACPI for CPU scaling?
> >
>
> Felix, did you try this?
>
ACPI is the preferred (and only standardized) method of controlling cpu
throttling on x86 systems.
Also, as I said earlier, I wanted to see an lspci for the usb issues.
Thanks,
Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-22 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-11 20:21 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10 Felix von Leitner
2005-03-12 1:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-13 21:30 ` Felix von Leitner
2005-03-12 1:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 0:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 2:18 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2005-03-22 16:22 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2005-03-24 11:59 ` [PATCH] [IPV6] Fix address/interface handling according to the scoping architecture (is Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-04-25 19:57 ` IPv6 has trouble assigning an interface Felix von Leitner
2005-04-25 21:00 ` Pekka Savola
2005-04-26 6:10 ` Felix von Leitner
2005-04-27 22:57 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-27 23:31 ` David Stevens
2005-04-25 22:38 ` David Stevens
2005-03-12 1:35 ` 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10 Andrew Morton
2005-03-12 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-12 3:54 ` Adam Belay
2005-03-22 0:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 0:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 1:20 ` Adam Belay [this message]
2005-03-22 1:20 ` Adam Belay
2005-03-22 22:29 ` Felix von Leitner
2005-03-24 23:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2005-03-25 0:17 ` Felix von Leitner
2005-05-25 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-25 13:37 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-03-25 13:37 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-03-13 21:31 ` Felix von Leitner
2005-03-12 3:51 ` Adam Belay
[not found] <3GZyA-16B-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-03-12 5:06 ` Robert Hancock
2005-03-12 5:19 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-12 10:24 Stefan Rompf
2005-03-12 20:34 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1111454454.6633.5.camel@linux.site \
--to=abelay@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cpufreq@ZenII.linux.org.uk \
--cc=felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.