[Bluez-users] Congratulation to qualification

[Bluez-users] Congratulation to qualification

[Michal Semler]

Hi Marcel,

It is great to have BlueZ qualificated. How did you do it, that company paid 
it? How expensive was it? Why only these two profiles and not others? Why not 
1.2?

Michal


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users

Re: [Bluez-users] Congratulation to qualification

[Marcel Holtmann]

Hi Michal,

> It is great to have BlueZ qualificated. How did you do it, that company paid 
> it? How expensive was it? Why only these two profiles and not others? Why not 
> 1.2?

this is correct. TomTom paid the listing fee for the qualification and
thus it is also listed under their name. The price for an adopter member
is 10,000 USD and I will not talk about any other expenses.

The qualification of GAP and SPP and Bluetooth 1.1 only are because this
is what was needed to make it re-useable. Companies can now take this
listing and don't have to re-qualify the lower layers. A Bluetooth 1.2
or 2.0 qualification would have been nice, but actually there was no
time for it.

Regards

Marcel




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users

Re: [Bluez-users] Congratulation to qualification

[Michal Semler]

Dne st 13. dubna 2005 16:16 Marcel Holtmann napsal(a):
> Hi Michal,
>
> > It is great to have BlueZ qualificated. How did you do it, that company
> > paid it? How expensive was it? Why only these two profiles and not
> > others? Why not 1.2?
>
> this is correct. TomTom paid the listing fee for the qualification and
> thus it is also listed under their name. The price for an adopter member
> is 10,000 USD and I will not talk about any other expenses.
>
> The qualification of GAP and SPP and Bluetooth 1.1 only are because this
> is what was needed to make it re-useable. Companies can now take this
> listing and don't have to re-qualify the lower layers. A Bluetooth 1.2
> or 2.0 qualification would have been nice, but actually there was no
> time for it.

Are these planed too?

Michal


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users

Re: [Bluez-users] Congratulation to qualification

[Marcel Holtmann]

Hi Michal,

> > > It is great to have BlueZ qualificated. How did you do it, that company
> > > paid it? How expensive was it? Why only these two profiles and not
> > > others? Why not 1.2?
> >
> > this is correct. TomTom paid the listing fee for the qualification and
> > thus it is also listed under their name. The price for an adopter member
> > is 10,000 USD and I will not talk about any other expenses.
> >
> > The qualification of GAP and SPP and Bluetooth 1.1 only are because this
> > is what was needed to make it re-useable. Companies can now take this
> > listing and don't have to re-qualify the lower layers. A Bluetooth 1.2
> > or 2.0 qualification would have been nice, but actually there was no
> > time for it.
> 
> Are these planed too?

not at the moment and actually I only wanna do the testing again when we
have full L2CAP flow and retransmission and connectionless support. We
also need a lot more testing tools, because these automated tests can be
very picky about what they expect.

We also don't use any Bluetooth 1.2 or 2.0 features at the moment. All
features on the HCI level can't be qualified.

Regards

Marcel




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users