All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] read/write on attribute w/o show/store should return -ENOSYS
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:42:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1114710135.6682.60.camel@betsy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050428172659.GA18859@kroah.com>

On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote:

> What is the POSIX standard for this?  ENOSYS or EACCESS?
> 
> Or anyone have a link that I can look this up at?

ENOSYS isn't defined by SUSv3 (and thus not POSIX) for write(2).

EACCESS is defined only for socket errors, but you could of course
hijack it.  I think it is silly, though, since the open(2) succeeded.
Ideally, the open for writing should fail with EACCESS.

EIO actually means that an internal or physical I/O error occurred, PLUS
it is reserved for implementation-defined errors.  So that makes sense.

The main thing is to _not_ return zero.  That would cause stdio to
resubmit indefinitely.

	Robert Love



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-28 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-28  5:30 [RFC/PATCH 0/5] read/write on attribute w/o show/store should return -ENOSYS Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-28  5:31 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/5] sysfs: if show/store is missing " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-28  5:41 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/5] sysfs: (driver/base) " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-28  5:42 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/5] sysfs: (driver/pci) " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-28  5:43 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/5] sysfs: (driver/block) " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-28  5:44 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/5] sysfs: (rest) " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-28 17:26 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/5] read/write on attribute w/o show/store should " Greg KH
2005-04-28 17:37   ` Chris Wright
2005-04-28 17:44     ` Robert Love
2005-04-28 17:51     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-28 19:56       ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-04-28 20:08         ` Robert Love
2005-04-28 17:42   ` Robert Love [this message]
2005-04-29  6:22     ` [PATCH 1/5 (take 2)] sysfs: if show/store is missing return -EIO Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-29  6:23       ` [PATCH 2/5 (take 2)] sysfs: (driver/base) " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-29  6:26       ` [PATCH 4/5 (take 2)] sysfs: (driver/block) " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-29  6:26       ` [PATCH 3/5 (take 2)] sysfs: (driver/pci) " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-29  6:27       ` [PATCH 5/5 (take 2)] sysfs: (rest) " Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1114710135.6682.60.camel@betsy \
    --to=rml@novell.com \
    --cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.