All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 07:46:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050502150632.GM577@postel.suug.ch>

On Mon, 2005-02-05 at 17:06 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * jamal <1115035838.8929.236.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-02 08:10
[..]
> > I am beginning to think that perhaps classid should stay as a local
> > scope metadata and what Patrick suggested maybe the way out. Although i
> > have to admit I dont like a generic function to have a parameter that
> > only a very small set of users find useful. If we are going to allow a
> > structure to be passed back and forth, perhaps it should also carry
> > other things (in addition to _result). Need to think a little.
> 
> What about if we introduce something like struct tcf_pkt_info as we
> have it for ematches? I'm using it intensly to share information
> from the classifier to ematches to extend and customize existing
> classifier. 

Basically, something along those lines (eg struct tca_pkt_info) in which
the tcf_result is one of the components should do it. 

I would be satisfied with this being the structure in the ->act()
parameters because then it could also be used to pass action-metadata
around (no action written so far needs such coordination, but its been
one of those things i have been thinking of for some dynamic creations
for example  where the return code is insufficient to describe things).
Patrick, either you or i could do it. It doesnt matter if at the moment
the structure only contains tcf_result or elements of tcf_result because
i will add more to it later. Then we could kill access to tc_classid in
exec()

> We could declare tc_classid as being global by definition
> and hide the current use in the API? I'd really like to be able to
> transfer classification results from one device to another.

since tc_classid suddenly becomes available theres no question about the
need for it being global - which is selectable at the meta action.

Global I believe means you dont reset it when you clone/copy.
skb->tc_verd is only cleared when we free the skb at the moment and
transfered when we clone or copy. A bit or two could be reserved in the
tc_verd to say "clear tc_classid" and have the meta action decide if it
is global(dont clear) or not(clear - current behavior) during
clone/copy . Does this sound reasonable?
 
cheers,
jamal

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-04 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-30 16:50 patch: Action repeat jamal
2005-04-30 17:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 17:08   ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 17:27     ` jamal
2005-04-30 18:13       ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 19:51         ` jamal
2005-04-30 20:08           ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-30 20:50             ` jamal
2005-04-30 21:55               ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-30 22:34                 ` jamal
2005-04-30 23:58                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-02 12:10                     ` jamal
2005-05-02 15:06                       ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 11:46                         ` jamal [this message]
2005-05-04 12:15                           ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-04 12:31                           ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 12:59                             ` jamal
2005-05-04 13:28                               ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:33                                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:33                                 ` jamal
2005-05-04 13:48                                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:53                                     ` jamal
2005-05-04 14:05                                       ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 14:23                                         ` jamal
2005-05-04 14:53                                           ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-05 13:06                                             ` jamal
2005-05-01  0:08             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-01  0:06           ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-03 23:28 ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.