From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 14:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* jamal <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-04 07:46
> Basically, something along those lines (eg struct tca_pkt_info) in which
> the tcf_result is one of the components should do it.
>
> I would be satisfied with this being the structure in the ->act()
> parameters because then it could also be used to pass action-metadata
> around (no action written so far needs such coordination, but its been
> one of those things i have been thinking of for some dynamic creations
> for example where the return code is insufficient to describe things).
> Patrick, either you or i could do it. It doesnt matter if at the moment
> the structure only contains tcf_result or elements of tcf_result because
> i will add more to it later. Then we could kill access to tc_classid in
> exec()
Sounds good.
> Global I believe means you dont reset it when you clone/copy.
> skb->tc_verd is only cleared when we free the skb at the moment and
> transfered when we clone or copy. A bit or two could be reserved in the
> tc_verd to say "clear tc_classid" and have the meta action decide if it
> is global(dont clear) or not(clear - current behavior) during
> clone/copy . Does this sound reasonable?
I have no objections but fail to see why we want to clear it anyway?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-04 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-30 16:50 patch: Action repeat jamal
2005-04-30 17:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 17:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 17:27 ` jamal
2005-04-30 18:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 19:51 ` jamal
2005-04-30 20:08 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-30 20:50 ` jamal
2005-04-30 21:55 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-30 22:34 ` jamal
2005-04-30 23:58 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-02 12:10 ` jamal
2005-05-02 15:06 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 11:46 ` jamal
2005-05-04 12:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-04 12:31 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-05-04 12:59 ` jamal
2005-05-04 13:28 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:33 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:33 ` jamal
2005-05-04 13:48 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:53 ` jamal
2005-05-04 14:05 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 14:23 ` jamal
2005-05-04 14:53 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-05 13:06 ` jamal
2005-05-01 0:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-01 0:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-03 23:28 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.