* getting eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet message
@ 2005-05-26 14:39 cranium2003
2005-05-26 16:37 ` Lee Revell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: cranium2003 @ 2005-05-26 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
While transmitting packets through linux Router
host from one network to another Redhat linux 9 kernel
2.4.20-8 caught kernel oops following there are 2
statements which are
__alloc_pages: 0 order allocation failed (gfp =
0x20/1)
eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet
What this means? where is the wrong thing in kenrel?
How to solve this problem?
regards,
cranium.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* getting eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet message
@ 2005-05-26 14:40 cranium2003
2005-05-26 16:22 ` Jon Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: cranium2003 @ 2005-05-26 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: net dev
Hello,
While transmitting packets through linux Router
host from one network to another Redhat linux 9 kernel
2.4.20-8 caught kernel oops following there are 2
statements which are
__alloc_pages: 0 order allocation failed (gfp =
0x20/1)
eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet
What this means? where is the wrong thing in kenrel?
How to solve this problem?
regards,
cranium.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: getting eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet message
2005-05-26 14:40 cranium2003
@ 2005-05-26 16:22 ` Jon Mason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jon Mason @ 2005-05-26 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cranium2003; +Cc: net dev
On Thursday 26 May 2005 09:40 am, cranium2003 wrote:
> Hello,
> While transmitting packets through linux Router
> host from one network to another Redhat linux 9 kernel
> 2.4.20-8 caught kernel oops following there are 2
> statements which are
> __alloc_pages: 0 order allocation failed (gfp =
> 0x20/1)
> eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet
> What this means?
The driver was trying to alloc a rx skb and couldn't. The incoming packet was
dropped. Assuming that the error logged is the only problem you saw, this
isn't a driver or kernel bug. It means you were out of free kernel memory.
You can see if you have any processes consuming lots of memory.
Thanks,
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: getting eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet message
2005-05-26 14:39 getting eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet message cranium2003
@ 2005-05-26 16:37 ` Lee Revell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lee Revell @ 2005-05-26 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cranium2003; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 07:39 -0700, cranium2003 wrote:
> Hello,
> While transmitting packets through linux Router
> host from one network to another Redhat linux 9 kernel
> 2.4.20-8 caught kernel oops following there are 2
> statements which are
> __alloc_pages: 0 order allocation failed (gfp =
> 0x20/1)
> eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet
> What this means? where is the wrong thing in kenrel?
> How to solve this problem?
That just means you ran low on memory so the router dropped a packet.
Get more RAM, or handle fewer packets ;-)
Lee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-26 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-26 14:39 getting eth1: Memory squeeze, dropping packet message cranium2003
2005-05-26 16:37 ` Lee Revell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-26 14:40 cranium2003
2005-05-26 16:22 ` Jon Mason
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.