From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: paulmck@us.ibm.com
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhuey@lnxw.com, andrea@suse.de,
tglx@linutronix.de, karim@opersys.com, mingo@elte.hu,
pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com,
dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:38:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1118435904.6423.40.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050610154745.GA1300@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 08:47 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Does the LTP include an RT latency test yet?
>
> Not as far as I know. I believe that LTP contains primarily pass-fail
> rather than performance tests, but regardless of where RT latency
> tests live, I believe that there needs to be a good home for them.
Maybe I didn't mean LTP, I'm thinking of whatever that popular benchmark
suite is that people use to identify performance regressions. OSDL
something or other?
The canonical test is "rtc_wakeup", it just sets up a stream of
interrupts from the RTC, polls on it and measures the delay. Check the
list archives for the URL.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-10 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-08 2:26 Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-08 3:00 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-08 14:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-08 16:51 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-09 2:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-09 11:20 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-06-08 18:46 ` Chris Friesen
2005-06-08 19:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 22:25 ` Eric Piel
2005-06-10 23:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 23:23 ` Eric Piel
2005-06-11 0:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 1:38 ` Eric Piel
2005-06-11 1:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-09 23:34 ` Tim Bird
2005-06-09 23:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 2:59 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-10 15:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 17:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 19:39 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 19:41 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-10 20:26 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-10 22:37 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 22:43 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 22:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 23:00 ` Flames go here (was Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread) Lee Revell
2005-06-10 23:08 ` Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-11 1:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 1:50 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-11 2:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 15:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-11 21:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 23:48 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 17:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-12 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 1:35 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 14:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 19:49 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 20:03 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-13 20:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 20:26 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 20:23 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-13 20:28 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-13 22:00 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 22:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 22:18 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 22:28 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 22:29 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 22:55 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-14 1:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-06-14 2:07 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-14 2:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-06-14 2:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-06-14 3:24 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-14 16:41 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2005-06-14 19:20 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-14 19:35 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-06-14 21:29 ` Gene Heskett
2005-06-14 20:19 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2005-06-14 7:00 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2005-06-14 16:09 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2005-06-14 16:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-13 20:38 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 20:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 20:31 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 20:34 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 21:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-12 17:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-12 18:43 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-12 19:12 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-11 5:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 17:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 20:22 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-10 20:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-10 21:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 22:19 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 22:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 22:49 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-10 23:01 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 23:15 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 23:26 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-06-10 23:41 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-11 1:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 15:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-11 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 0:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 20:38 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-06-10 23:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-08 15:54 Eric Piel
2005-06-09 2:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 21:58 ` Eric Piel
2005-06-11 1:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 22:20 Saksena, Manas
2005-06-13 22:42 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 22:44 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 22:43 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 22:43 Saksena, Manas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1118435904.6423.40.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=karim@opersys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.