From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Wilkens <robw@optonline.net>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix i386 signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask (was: Re: Signal handling possibly wrong)
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:00:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123621223.9553.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050809204928.GH7991@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:49 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> SA_NODEFER
> [XSI] If set and sig is caught, sig shall not be added to the thread's
> signal mask on entry to the signal handler unless it is included in
> sa_mask. Otherwise, sig shall always be added to the thread's signal
> mask on entry to the signal handler.
>
> Brodo, is this what you mean?
>
> thanks,
> -chris
> --
>
> Subject: [PATCH] fix SA_NODEFER signals to honor sa_mask
>
> When receiving SA_NODEFER signal, kernel was inapproriately not applying
> the sa_mask. As pointed out by Brodo Stroesser.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c b/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -577,13 +577,12 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo
> else
> ret = setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset, regs);
>
> - if (ret && !(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
> - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> - sigorsets(¤t->blocked,¤t->blocked,&ka->sa.sa_mask);
> + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> + sigorsets(¤t->blocked,¤t->blocked,&ka->sa.sa_mask);
> + if (ret && !(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
> sigaddset(¤t->blocked,sig);
> - recalc_sigpending();
> - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> - }
> + recalc_sigpending();
> + spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
>
> return ret;
> }
Hmm, I think you want this patch. You still need to check the return of
setting up the frames.
-- Steve
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
--- linux-2.6.13-rc6-git1/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c.orig 2005-08-09 16:54:36.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-git1/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c 2005-08-09 16:55:24.000000000 -0400
@@ -577,10 +577,11 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo
else
ret = setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset, regs);
- if (ret && !(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
+ if (ret) {
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
sigorsets(¤t->blocked,¤t->blocked,&ka->sa.sa_mask);
- sigaddset(¤t->blocked,sig);
+ if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
+ sigaddset(¤t->blocked,sig);
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-09 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-09 17:44 Signal handling possibly wrong Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 18:26 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 18:32 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 18:39 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 18:44 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 19:04 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 19:41 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 20:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 20:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 20:49 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-08-09 21:06 ` [PATCH] Fix i386 signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask (was: Re: Signal handling possibly wrong) Chris Wright
2005-08-09 21:07 ` [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 21:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-10 3:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-10 3:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 18:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-08-12 18:45 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-12 18:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 19:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 19:31 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-12 21:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-14 11:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-12 21:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-14 22:04 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-08-13 18:47 ` Marc Ballarin
2005-08-10 9:44 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 21:04 ` Signal handling possibly wrong Chris Wright
2005-08-10 9:11 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-10 16:20 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 19:33 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2005-08-09 18:50 ` smbus driver for ati xpress 200m yhlu
2005-08-09 22:57 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-10 2:51 ` yhlu
2005-08-10 7:27 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1123621223.9553.4.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robw@optonline.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.