From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Robert Wilkens <robw@optonline.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
gdt@linuxppc.org, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:33:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1123644815.9553.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1123643401.9553.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 790 bytes --]
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 23:10 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
> sigaddset(&act.sa_mask,SIGUSR1);
> ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR1);
> if (ret == 1) {
> printf("sa_mask does not block sig\n");
> } else if (ret == 0) {
> printf("sa_mask blocks sig\n");
> } else {
> printf("Unknown return code!!\n");
> }
>
> exit(0);
> exit(0);
Yuck! OK I was into the cut and paste here. This probably would look
much better as
ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR1);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
printf("...");
break;
case 1:
printf("...");
break;
default:
printf("Unknown...");
}
And what was I doing with the double exits??
OK, time for bed.
-- Steve
[-- Attachment #2: test_signal.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 3696 bytes --]
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
static int u1;
static int u2;
static void user1(int x)
{
/* for testing against itself */
if (u1)
u2 = 1;
u1 = 1;
sleep(5);
u1 = 0;
}
static void user2(int x)
{
if (u1)
u2 = 1;
}
static void intr(int x)
{
exit(u2);
}
static void start(struct sigaction *act)
{
struct sigaction a;
memset(&a,0,sizeof(a));
a.sa_handler = intr;
if ((sigaction(SIGINT,&a,NULL)) < 0) {
perror("sigaction");
exit(-1);
}
/*
* This is the testing handler
*/
act->sa_handler = user1;
if ((sigaction(SIGUSR1,act,NULL)) < 0) {
perror("sigaction");
exit(-1);
}
a.sa_handler = user2;
if ((sigaction(SIGUSR2,&a,NULL)) < 0) {
perror("sigaction");
exit(-1);
}
for (;;)
;
}
int testsig(struct sigaction *act, int sig1, int sig2)
{
int pid;
int status;
if ((pid = fork()) < 0) {
perror("fork");
} else if (!pid) {
/*
* Test1 sa_mask includes SIGUSR2
*/
start(act);
exit(0);
}
/*
* Send first signal to start the test.
*/
kill(pid,sig1);
/*
* SIGUSR1 sleeps for 5, just sleep for on here
* to make sure the system got it.
*/
sleep(1);
/*
* Send the second signal to the child, to see if
* this wakes it up.
*/
kill(pid,sig2);
sleep(1);
/*
* End the test.
*/
kill(pid,SIGINT);
waitpid(pid,&status,0);
return WEXITSTATUS(status);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
struct sigaction act;
int ret;
memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
sigaddset(&act.sa_mask,SIGUSR2);
ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR2);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
printf("sa_mask blocks other signals\n");
break;
case 1:
printf("sa_mask does not block other signals\n");
break;
default:
printf("Unknown return code!!\n");
}
memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
act.sa_flags |= SA_NODEFER;
ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR2);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
printf("SA_NODEFER blocks other signals\n");
break;
case 1:
printf("SA_NODEFER does not block other signals\n");
break;
default:
printf("Unknown return code!!\n");
}
memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
act.sa_flags |= SA_NODEFER;
sigaddset(&act.sa_mask,SIGUSR2);
ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR2);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
printf("SA_NODEFER does not affect sa_mask\n");
break;
case 1:
printf("SA_NODEFER affects sa_mask\n");
break;
default:
printf("Unknown return code!!\n");
}
memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
act.sa_flags |= SA_NODEFER;
sigaddset(&act.sa_mask,SIGUSR1);
ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR1);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
printf("SA_NODEFER and sa_mask blocks sig\n");
break;
case 1:
printf("SA_NODEFER and sa_mask does not block sig\n");
break;
default:
printf("Unknown return code!!\n");
}
memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR1);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
printf("!SA_NODEFER blocks sig\n");
break;
case 1:
printf("!SA_NODEFER does not block sig\n");
break;
default:
printf("Unknown return code!!\n");
}
memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
act.sa_flags |= SA_NODEFER;
ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR1);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
printf("SA_NODEFER blocks sig\n");
break;
case 1:
printf("SA_NODEFER does not block sig\n");
break;
default:
printf("Unknown return code!!\n");
}
memset(&act,0,sizeof(act));
sigaddset(&act.sa_mask,SIGUSR1);
ret = testsig(&act,SIGUSR1,SIGUSR1);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
printf("sa_mask blocks sig\n");
break;
case 1:
printf("sa_mask does not block sig\n");
break;
default:
printf("Unknown return code!!\n");
}
exit(0);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-10 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-09 17:44 Signal handling possibly wrong Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 18:26 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 18:32 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 18:39 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 18:44 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 19:04 ` Robert Wilkens
2005-08-09 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 19:41 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 20:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 20:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 20:49 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 21:00 ` [PATCH] Fix i386 signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask (was: Re: Signal handling possibly wrong) Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 21:06 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 21:07 ` [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask Steven Rostedt
2005-08-09 21:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-10 3:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-10 3:33 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-08-12 18:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-08-12 18:45 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-12 18:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 19:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-12 19:31 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-12 21:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-14 11:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-12 21:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-14 22:04 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-08-13 18:47 ` Marc Ballarin
2005-08-10 9:44 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-09 21:04 ` Signal handling possibly wrong Chris Wright
2005-08-10 9:11 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-08-10 16:20 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-09 19:33 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2005-08-09 18:50 ` smbus driver for ati xpress 200m yhlu
2005-08-09 22:57 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-10 2:51 ` yhlu
2005-08-10 7:27 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1123644815.9553.37.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=gdt@linuxppc.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robw@optonline.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.