From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: When are machine checks suppose to be recoverable?
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:44:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124315089.8857.41.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76E28B16-5706-48C8-B92A-349C4F40FA76@freescale.com>
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 09:00 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> David's 8250 cleanup patch made me wondering when are machine checks
> suppose to recoverable? General class of conditions is what I'm
> looking for here.
>
> Is David's case due to some PCI master abort or something else?
Might be some issue on SMP machines...
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-17 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-16 16:21 [PATCH] Use platform device for 8250 registration David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 6:30 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 6:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-17 7:31 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 13:54 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 15:22 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 15:30 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 16:16 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 16:27 ` Matt Porter
2005-08-17 16:35 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 16:27 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 11:11 ` Russell King
2005-08-17 16:39 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 16:46 ` Russell King
2005-08-17 14:00 ` When are machine checks suppose to be recoverable? Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 21:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-08-17 22:30 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-18 3:42 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-23 2:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-08-23 16:43 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-23 17:04 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-23 23:10 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1124315089.8857.41.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.