From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use platform device for 8250 registration
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:46:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050817174600.A22040@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124296771.3869.74.camel@localhost.localdomain>; from dwmw2@infradead.org on Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:39:30PM +0100
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:39:30PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 12:11 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Doesn't PPC64 have NO_IRQ ?
>
> PPC64 does but I find no definition of is_real_interrupt() other than
> the bogus one in 8250.c which checks for zero. PPC32 does not -- let's
> clean that one up separately.
Ok. I'll give you this line now for this patch:
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
so you're free to push it upstream whenever you deem is the right time.
Thanks.
--
Russell King
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-17 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-16 16:21 [PATCH] Use platform device for 8250 registration David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 6:30 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 6:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-17 7:31 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 13:54 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 15:22 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 15:30 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 16:16 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 16:27 ` Matt Porter
2005-08-17 16:35 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 16:27 ` Tom Rini
2005-08-17 11:11 ` Russell King
2005-08-17 16:39 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-17 16:46 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-08-17 14:00 ` When are machine checks suppose to be recoverable? Kumar Gala
2005-08-17 21:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-17 22:30 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-18 3:42 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-23 2:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-08-23 16:43 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-23 17:04 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-23 23:10 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050817174600.A22040@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.