From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Peter Zubaj <pzubaj@gaya.sk>
Cc: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Emmanuel Fleury <fleury@cs.aau.dk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:39:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124833199.30517.23.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124829672.3351.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 21:41 +0100, Peter Zubaj wrote:
> This is too expensive card to be only able use it as simple card.
> My advice buy something else.
> I don't think fight with creative can bring anything good to linux.
> Leave Creative as is. There is plenty of other hardware from other
> manufacturer worth money.
I agree, but the fact is that the emu10k* devices own the Windows gamer
market and like it or not these devices will sell millions of units, and
they've worked perfectly in Linux for years. So these users have a
reasonable expectation that Creative will provide them an upgrade path,
just like they did for SBLive! -> Audigy1 and Audigy1 -> Audigy2.
I'm not trying to pick a fight with Creative, but regardless of what I
(or any Linux developer) does, there's going to be a fight if they try
to lock out Linux users.
Lee
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Peter Zubaj <pzubaj@gaya.sk>
Cc: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Emmanuel Fleury <fleury@cs.aau.dk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:39:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124833199.30517.23.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124829672.3351.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 21:41 +0100, Peter Zubaj wrote:
> This is too expensive card to be only able use it as simple card.
> My advice buy something else.
> I don't think fight with creative can bring anything good to linux.
> Leave Creative as is. There is plenty of other hardware from other
> manufacturer worth money.
I agree, but the fact is that the emu10k* devices own the Windows gamer
market and like it or not these devices will sell millions of units, and
they've worked perfectly in Linux for years. So these users have a
reasonable expectation that Creative will provide them an upgrade path,
just like they did for SBLive! -> Audigy1 and Audigy1 -> Audigy2.
I'm not trying to pick a fight with Creative, but regardless of what I
(or any Linux developer) does, there's going to be a fight if they try
to lock out Linux users.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-23 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-19 9:55 [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip Emmanuel Fleury
2005-08-19 22:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 5:17 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 6:48 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-08-20 7:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 7:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-22 12:18 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-08-22 12:18 ` [Alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2005-08-22 20:38 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-08-22 20:38 ` [Alsa-devel] " James Courtier-Dutton
2005-08-22 21:54 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-23 20:41 ` Peter Zubaj
2005-08-23 18:48 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-08-23 18:48 ` [Alsa-devel] " Lennart Sorensen
2005-08-23 22:12 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-23 21:39 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-08-23 21:39 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1124833199.30517.23.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=James@superbug.co.uk \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=fleury@cs.aau.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pzubaj@gaya.sk \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.