All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
	magnus@valinux.co.jp,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"A. P. Whitcroft [imap]" <andyw@uk.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:46:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126140395.6354.14.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050907164945.14aba736.akpm@osdl.org>

On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
> > Ah, OK - makes more sense. However, some machines do have large holes
> > in e820 map setups - is not really critical, more of an efficiency
> > thing.
> 
> Confused.   Does all this mean that we want the patch, or not?

I say we wait on it.

Martin brings up a scenario in which SPARSEMEM is useful without NUMA,
but it Magnus's patch doesn't actually deal with systems like that.
Let's do it right, and base the memory_present() calls off of real data
from the e820 or efi data.

-- Dave


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
	magnus@valinux.co.jp,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"A. P. Whitcroft [imap]" <andyw@uk.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:46:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126140395.6354.14.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050907164945.14aba736.akpm@osdl.org>

On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
> > Ah, OK - makes more sense. However, some machines do have large holes
> > in e820 map setups - is not really critical, more of an efficiency
> > thing.
> 
> Confused.   Does all this mean that we want the patch, or not?

I say we wait on it.

Martin brings up a scenario in which SPARSEMEM is useful without NUMA,
but it Magnus's patch doesn't actually deal with systems like that.
Let's do it right, and base the memory_present() calls off of real data
from the e820 or efi data.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-08 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-06  3:56 [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix Magnus Damm
2005-09-06  3:56 ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-07 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-07 17:28   ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-07 18:22   ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-07 18:22     ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-07 18:27     ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-07 18:27       ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-07 18:34       ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-07 18:34         ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-07 23:49         ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-07 23:49           ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-08  0:46           ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-09-08  0:46             ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-08  1:54           ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  1:54             ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  6:11           ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-08  6:11             ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-08  6:36             ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  6:36               ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  1:51       ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  1:51         ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  1:45     ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  1:45       ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  1:40   ` Magnus Damm
2005-09-08  1:40     ` Magnus Damm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1126140395.6354.14.camel@localhost \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andyw@uk.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=magnus@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.