From: Parag Warudkar <kernel-stuff@comcast.net>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm2
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:17:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126930657.7927.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509162038_MC3-1-AA6D-60D9@compuserve.com>
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 20:36 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> It looks to me like that patch corrupts ebp.
>
> This one works for me, though ebp still appears wrong to a 32-bit
> debugger on syscall exit trace. Maybe that doesn't matter so much.
Did you compile the program under a x86_64 kernel, distro? I ask because
it doesn't compile for me. On my machine asm-i386/user.h and
asm-x86_64/user.h both do not contain a user_regs_struct definition with
x86 registers.
Another thing I noticed was that with the patch %eax was zero for the
failing program although I didn't see how the patch affects %eax.
Parag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-17 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-17 0:36 2.6.13-mm2 Chuck Ebbert
2005-09-17 4:17 ` Parag Warudkar [this message]
2005-09-17 4:30 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Parag Warudkar
[not found] <4KtRD-7Nt-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-09-08 23:23 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Ronny V. Vindenes
2005-09-08 23:34 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 0:26 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Parag Warudkar
2005-09-09 0:55 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Roland McGrath
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-08 12:30 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 13:12 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Benoit Boissinot
2005-09-08 13:48 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-08 14:30 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-09 0:39 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 10:41 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 10:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-08 17:20 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-08 19:39 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 7:02 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-09 1:47 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-09 9:43 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 13:45 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-10 6:33 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Marko Kohtala
2005-09-10 11:45 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 12:42 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 13:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 20:21 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 21:26 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 18:43 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dominik Karall
2005-09-10 22:12 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 23:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:56 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 0:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 0:49 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 0:58 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 1:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 1:22 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 1:25 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 17:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 19:36 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 20:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-12 19:19 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 20:08 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-12 10:04 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:06 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:09 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-18 21:49 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-19 3:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-19 15:56 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-23 16:52 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 20:05 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-29 15:22 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Linus Torvalds
2005-09-12 3:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 5:01 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 6:09 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 7:16 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:06 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 18:19 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dave Hansen
2005-09-12 18:51 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 22:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-13 0:08 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-13 4:00 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 3:10 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126930657.7927.5.camel@localhost \
--to=kernel-stuff@comcast.net \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.