From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:50:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132609858.26560.36.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17282.15177.804471.298409@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 08:25 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Ingo Molnar writes:
>
> > is there any architecture where irq 0 is a legitimate setting that could
> > occur in drivers, and which would make NO_IRQ define of 0 non-practical?
>
> Yes, G5 powermacs have the SATA controller on irq 0. So if we can't
> use irq 0, I can't get to my hard disk. :) Other powermacs also use
> irq 0 for various things, as do embedded PPC machines.
And other non-ppc embedded things I've seen in the past... I think it's
quite common outside of the x86 world
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-21 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-21 1:14 [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 11:12 ` David Howells
2005-11-21 12:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-21 21:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-11-21 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-21 21:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 23:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 21:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 23:20 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-11-22 1:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 2:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 21:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-11-21 22:20 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-22 11:13 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 14:15 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-22 14:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-22 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 18:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-22 18:37 ` David Howells
2005-11-22 19:03 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 23:58 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 19:38 ` David Howells
2005-11-22 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-23 1:45 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-21 21:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1132609858.26560.36.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.