From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:20:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051122182014.GO1598@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511220856470.13959@g5.osdl.org>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In short: NO_IRQ _is_ 0. Always has been. It's the only sane value. And
> btw, there is no need for that #define at all, exactly because the way you
> test for "is this no irq" is by doing "!dev->irq".
Could you at least take the first patch that checks that we don't go
outside the bounds of the irq_desc array?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-22 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-21 1:14 [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 11:12 ` David Howells
2005-11-21 12:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 19:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-21 21:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-11-21 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-21 21:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 23:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 21:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 23:20 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-11-22 1:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 2:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-21 21:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:20 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-22 11:13 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 14:15 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-22 14:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-11-22 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 18:20 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2005-11-22 18:37 ` David Howells
2005-11-22 19:03 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 23:58 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-22 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-22 19:38 ` David Howells
2005-11-22 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-23 1:45 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-21 21:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 21:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-21 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-21 22:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051122182014.GO1598@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.