From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: kus Kusche Klaus <kus@keba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: My vote against eepro* removal
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 02:24:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1137655489.4736.33.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAD6DA242BC63C488511C611BD51F367323320@MAILIT.keba.co.at>
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 08:19 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
> Last time I tested (around 2.6.12), eepro100 worked much better
> in -rt kernels w.r.t. latencies than e100:
>
> e100 caused a periodic latency of about 500 microseconds
> exactly every 2 seconds, no matter what the load on the interface
> was (i.e. even on an idle interface).
>
> eepro100 did not show any latencies that long, it worked much
> smoother w.r.t. latencies.
>
> Of course I would prefer to have e100 fixed over keeping eepro100
> around forever, but the last time I checked, it still wasn't fixed.
Please provide latency traces to illustrate the problematic code path.
It sounds like you have known about this issue for a while, were you
waiting for it to fix itself?
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-19 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 7:19 My vote against eepro* removal kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-19 7:24 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-01-19 7:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-19 10:08 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-19 10:26 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-19 16:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 17:16 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-19 19:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-19 22:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-20 9:37 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-20 9:55 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-01-21 0:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 1:19 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-21 1:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 2:01 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-21 3:56 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-20 10:19 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-20 11:02 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-01-21 0:45 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-20 10:51 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-20 11:05 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-01-20 11:27 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-23 11:01 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-23 20:23 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-01-24 7:38 kus Kusche Klaus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1137655489.4736.33.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=kus@keba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.