From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: kus Kusche Klaus <kus@keba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Subject: RE: My vote against eepro* removal
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:09:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1137697744.6762.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAD6DA242BC63C488511C611BD51F367323322@MAILIT.keba.co.at>
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 11:26 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
> > From: Lee Revell
> > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 08:19 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
> > > Last time I tested (around 2.6.12), eepro100 worked much better
> > > in -rt kernels w.r.t. latencies than e100:
Try the latest -rt kernel with e100 to see if it still is a delay. You
can also run in PREEMPT_DESKTOP so that the interrupt handlers are not
threads and see if that shows up in the latency.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-19 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 10:26 My vote against eepro* removal kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-19 16:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 17:16 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-19 19:09 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2006-01-19 22:57 ` Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-24 7:38 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-23 11:01 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-23 20:23 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-01-20 11:27 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-20 10:51 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-20 11:05 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-01-20 10:19 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-20 11:02 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-01-21 0:45 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-20 9:37 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-20 9:55 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-01-21 0:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 1:19 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-21 1:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 2:01 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-21 3:56 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19 10:08 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-19 7:19 kus Kusche Klaus
2006-01-19 7:24 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19 7:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1137697744.6762.106.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=kus@keba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.