From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: MIke Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
gcoady@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:03:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1139771016.19342.253.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1139752033.27408.20.camel@homer>
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:47 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote:
> If you think it's the scheduler, how about try the patch below. It's
> against 2.6.16-rc2-mm1, and should tell you if it is the interactivity
> logic in the scheduler or not. I don't see other candidates in there,
> not that that means there aren't any of course.
I'll try, but it's a serious pain for me to build an -mm kernel. A
patch against 2.6.16-rc1 would be much easier.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-12 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-08 2:11 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Grant Coady
2006-02-08 2:24 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-08 2:50 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 3:02 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-08 2:35 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-08 2:55 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 3:00 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-08 4:12 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-02-08 4:41 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 4:51 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 5:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-02-08 5:39 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 7:43 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-09 17:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-09 20:06 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-10 6:35 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 13:47 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 19:03 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-02-12 21:36 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 23:23 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-12 23:39 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 3:09 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 3:39 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 4:59 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 5:05 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 5:32 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 5:37 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 5:57 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 6:08 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 6:35 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 6:38 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 7:08 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 8:43 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 10:06 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 12:35 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-15 4:22 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-15 5:22 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-15 6:11 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-15 7:17 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 7:15 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 7:41 ` MIke Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1139771016.19342.253.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gcoady@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.