From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>,
Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Conversion to generic boolean
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:48:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1156855700.6271.104.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060829114143.GB4076@infradead.org>
Ar Maw, 2006-08-29 am 12:41 +0100, ysgrifennodd Christoph Hellwig:
> gcc lets you happily assign any integer value to bool/_Bool, so unless
> you write sparse support for actually checking things there's not the
> slightest advantage in value range checking.
Not the case: gcc allows you to assign 0 or 1 to an _Bool type object.
When you are "assigning" integers you are merely seeing implicit casting
before the assignment.
Try int a = 4; _Bool b = a; int c = b; printf("%d\n", c);
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-29 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-26 3:24 Conversion to generic boolean Richard Knutsson
2006-08-28 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-28 9:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-08-29 11:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-28 10:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-28 11:11 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-08-28 12:17 ` Richard Knutsson
2006-08-28 19:15 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-08-28 20:55 ` Richard Knutsson
2006-08-28 21:19 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-08-28 21:55 ` Richard Knutsson
2006-08-29 11:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-29 12:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-29 13:26 ` Peter Williams
2006-08-29 13:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-29 12:48 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-08-29 0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-29 1:15 ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-29 5:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-31 3:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-09-03 12:51 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 7:29 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-08-29 11:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-29 12:18 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-08-29 11:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-29 14:10 ` Richard Knutsson
2006-08-29 15:47 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-29 5:43 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1156855700.6271.104.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=ricknu-0@student.ltu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.